Quote:
Originally Posted by epoh Because of post-processing. The color correction process they use doesn't necessarily know you intentionally blew out the yellow channel, or upped the saturation on the blues, etc. Any good professional print lab should have predictable results, once you've calibrated your monitor and done few test prints. I know exactly how my prints from Miller's will turn out, so why would I want or need someone else editing the photo? |
I understand that. And my original point stands, that you will most likely not get WYSIWYG results by just calibrating your monitor and uploading a color profile from a lab. It can get you very close however. We trust our lab and when we call them a) someone picks up the phone and b)the person who picks up the phone knows who we are. They know our style and everything, which is why we prefer a personal working relationship.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronocnikral the important thing is that you are getting satisfactory and consistent results. |
My other point also stands (which is what we are agreeing on). If you are getting consistent and satisfactory results, then why fix something that isn't broken? we prefer the personal relationship, but many (a good majority) are happy with the results from places like millers or even mpix. and there isn't a right or wrong way. the end result is left to human interpretation (trained or untrained, I know a lot of prints that aren't satisfactory to us would be for others), so it boils down to how picky your eye is and/or how good you are.