Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Business Discussion > Business Talk


Is a photo always the property of the Photographer?

This is a discussion on Is a photo always the property of the Photographer? within the Business Talk forums, part of the Business Discussion category; Is a photo always the property of the photographer no matter what was photographed?...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Senior Member
 
dryicerx's Avatar
 
Posts: 410
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, TX, Texas
Real First Name: J
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Is a photo always the property of the Photographer? - 10-07-2009, 09:23 PM


Is a photo always the property of the photographer no matter what was photographed?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Member
 
joemc's Avatar
 
Posts: 113
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ft Lauderdale Florida, Florida
Real First Name: Joe
Camera: Nikon D700
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
10-07-2009, 09:27 PM


Nope....there are times that I have to turn my memory card over after a shoot... I never ever get a chance to see what I shot.... And... If you do not copyright your images within 120 days of publishing them (loading them on the web) they are fair game for anyone to use..... I have learned the hard way!! (This may vary from state to state... I am quoting Florida law)

Joe

---------------------------
A camera is like a fine musical instrument. In the right hands it can make beautiful art....and in the wrong hands it can make nothing but noise.
--Joe McBroom--

Last edited by joemc; 10-07-2009 at 09:29 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
tone-bending bas%@rd
 
jeffkohn's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,648
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Jeff
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 4

Likes Received LIKES Received: 32
Likes Given LIKES Given: 22
10-07-2009, 09:32 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by dryicerx View Post
Is a photo always the property of the photographer no matter what was photographed?
If you enter into a "work for hire" agreement, then the person who is paying for your services would own the photos, which I believe is what Joe is referring to.

Outside of that, you automatically have the copyright of any photo you take, just by the act of taking it. It doesn't matter what's in the photo, except to the extent that in some cases taking a photo of a copyrighted work could be a copyright violation. (For instance you can't take a photo of a copyrighted painting then sell prints).

jeffkohn added 1 Minutes and 49 Seconds later...Double Post Merged Below

Quote:
Originally Posted by joemc View Post
And... If you do not copyright your images within 120 days of publishing them (loading them on the web) they are fair game for anyone to use..... I have learned the hard way!! (This may vary from state to state... I am quoting Florida law)
This is not true anymore, hasn't been true for decades. BTW copyright is a matter of federal law, FL law has nothing to do with it.

---------------------------
Jeff Kohn | The Majestic Landscape | Blog | More Images
"The capacity to compose images is really the capacity to give coherence to sensed experience" - Robert Motherwell

Last edited by jeffkohn; 10-07-2009 at 09:34 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Member
 
joemc's Avatar
 
Posts: 113
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ft Lauderdale Florida, Florida
Real First Name: Joe
Camera: Nikon D700
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
10-07-2009, 09:39 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffkohn View Post
If you enter into a "work for hire" agreement, then the person who is paying for your services would own the photos, which I believe is what Joe is referring to.

Outside of that, you automatically have the copyright of any photo you take, just by the act of taking it. It doesn't matter what's in the photo, except to the extent that in some cases taking a photo of a copyrighted work could be a copyright violation. (For instance you can't take a photo of a copyrighted painting then sell prints).

jeffkohn added 1 Minutes and 49 Seconds later...Double Post Merged Below

This is not true anymore, hasn't been true for decades. BTW copyright is a matter of federal law, FL law has nothing to do with it.
Really... I had a photo used last march and after a legal battle I lost for not copyrighting it?... Yeah...they had to give me credit for the photo...but they did not have to pay me?... Would love to know if you know something different because I would love to get paid from "script"

Unfortunately I have an attorney on retainer for this reason.

Joe

---------------------------
A camera is like a fine musical instrument. In the right hands it can make beautiful art....and in the wrong hands it can make nothing but noise.
--Joe McBroom--

Last edited by joemc; 10-07-2009 at 09:44 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
brad's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,314
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DFW, Texas
Real First Name: Brad (duh)
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 12

Likes Received LIKES Received: 136
Likes Given LIKES Given: 33
10-07-2009, 09:50 PM


Then you have a lousy lawyer.

The image is yours unless there is a different arrangement (work for hire being one).

If you do not register the copyright, the only thing that prevents you from doing is seeking punitive damages. You can still seek either fair use payment or you can tell them to cease and desist.

You need a new lawyer.

---------------------------
Brad Barton, Grand Prairie, TX (DFW) Twitter -- Blog -- Headshots -- Portraits
Honest critiques always welcomed.
An artist is not paid for his labor, but for his vision. -- James Whistler, Painter, 1834-1903
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Member
 
joemc's Avatar
 
Posts: 113
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ft Lauderdale Florida, Florida
Real First Name: Joe
Camera: Nikon D700
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
10-07-2009, 09:56 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by brad View Post
Then you have a lousy lawyer.

The image is yours unless there is a different arrangement (work for hire being one).

If you do not register the copyright, the only thing that prevents you from doing is seeking punitive damages. You can still seek either fair use payment or you can tell them to cease and desist.

You need a new lawyer.
I guess one would need to define "yours"... Yes it is "yours"..But if others can use it without paying you then there is a question about "yours"

Yes.... You can tell them to cease use......and they must.... But they still do not have to pay you....unless THEY feel like it....If it is copyrighted... You hold all the cards...if it is not....... Your out of luck!!

Fair use payment is a very open term.

The attorney that I used is the same that represent Harrison Funk (a friend of mine)...He was Micheal Jackson's personal photographer for a decade.

I would guess that he would give me fair advice?

cheers, joe

---------------------------
A camera is like a fine musical instrument. In the right hands it can make beautiful art....and in the wrong hands it can make nothing but noise.
--Joe McBroom--

Last edited by joemc; 10-07-2009 at 09:59 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
tone-bending bas%@rd
 
jeffkohn's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,648
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Jeff
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 4

Likes Received LIKES Received: 32
Likes Given LIKES Given: 22
10-07-2009, 09:59 PM


Quote:
Really... I had a photo used last march and after a legal battle I lost for not copyrighting it?... Yeah...they had to give me credit for the photo...but they did not have to pay me?... Would love to know if you know something different because I would love to get paid from "script"
As brad said, even if you hadn't yet registered the copyright, you can still enforce it and sue if someone infringes. In fact if this happens and you plan to take it to court it's a good idea to go ahead and register the image. Failing to register the copyright before the infringement takes place means that you cannot sue for punitive damages or court fees, but you can still sue for lost revenue, meaning whatever you would have gotten if they had paid to license the image from you. It sounds like maybe your lawyer "settled" for a photo credit instead of payment. Sometimes the 'lost revenue' amounts to less than what it would cost to take the case to court, so if you didn't register beforehand it may not make much economic sense to sue.

The only way they can use your image without your consent, registered or otherwise, is if the use fails under fair use.

---------------------------
Jeff Kohn | The Majestic Landscape | Blog | More Images
"The capacity to compose images is really the capacity to give coherence to sensed experience" - Robert Motherwell
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Member
 
joemc's Avatar
 
Posts: 113
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ft Lauderdale Florida, Florida
Real First Name: Joe
Camera: Nikon D700
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
10-07-2009, 10:15 PM


Because this really interested me. I called Harrison and asked him this question... He stated to me that you are correct.... But if you can not sue for punitive damages or legal fees then what would be the point?.... The legal fees and court cost alone could be 20 grand..... To win what? "fair use payment" It is a lose lose if you do not copyright!

I guess that is why my attorney just made them stop using it?

I think I may have a good attorney??

Cheers, joe

---------------------------
A camera is like a fine musical instrument. In the right hands it can make beautiful art....and in the wrong hands it can make nothing but noise.
--Joe McBroom--
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
tone-bending bas%@rd
 
jeffkohn's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,648
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Jeff
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 4

Likes Received LIKES Received: 32
Likes Given LIKES Given: 22
10-07-2009, 10:40 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by joemc View Post
Because this really interested me. I called Harrison and asked him this question... He stated to me that you are correct.... But if you can not sue for punitive damages or legal fees then what would be the point?.... The legal fees and court cost alone could be 20 grand..... To win what? "fair use payment" It is a lose lose if you do not copyright!

I guess that is why my attorney just made them stop using it?

I think I may have a good attorney??

Cheers, joe
I have no idea how much the actual legal fees would be, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if they exceeded what you could recover in lost revenue, and I mentioned that in my previous post. But still, that's different from what you said in your first post when you stated that unregistered images would be "fair game for anyone to use". What the other party did to you was illegal, and even if it's not financially practical to take them to court you can at least make the stop using the image, or negotiate some other sort of settlement such as payment, a photo credit, etc.

---------------------------
Jeff Kohn | The Majestic Landscape | Blog | More Images
"The capacity to compose images is really the capacity to give coherence to sensed experience" - Robert Motherwell
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
brad's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,314
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DFW, Texas
Real First Name: Brad (duh)
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 12

Likes Received LIKES Received: 136
Likes Given LIKES Given: 33
10-07-2009, 11:12 PM


What he said.

Sounds like you have a good lawyer, just you didn't understand what he was trying to explain until now.

---------------------------
Brad Barton, Grand Prairie, TX (DFW) Twitter -- Blog -- Headshots -- Portraits
Honest critiques always welcomed.
An artist is not paid for his labor, but for his vision. -- James Whistler, Painter, 1834-1903
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
Permanently Banned
 
CaptainTom's Avatar
 
Posts: 15,341
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Tx,
Real First Name: Tom
Camera: canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 24

Likes Received LIKES Received: 5
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
10-07-2009, 11:14 PM


Copyright laws are not that complicated and are easily researched on Google.

One thing that is hardly mentioned in these discussions is that you can put a zillion low res .jpegs on a CD-ROM and REGISTER them all at once.

Last edited by CaptainTom; 10-08-2009 at 08:54 AM..
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
Supa Dupa Poster
 
kenw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,666
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cypress, Texas
Real First Name: Ken
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 97
Likes Given LIKES Given: 82
10-08-2009, 08:16 AM


Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainTom View Post
....One thing that is hardly mentioned in these discussions is that you can put a zillion low res .jpegs on a CD-ROM and copyright them all at once.
slight correction: register them all at once. They were copyrighted the moment you took the pic, registered or not.

---------------------------
5th Generation Texian.
(line 2) Watch this, Spot!
(line 3) Have I shown you my photos of my grandson? Wait, don't run! Hey!
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
Forum Master
 
bryanlindsey's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,337
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Bryan
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 48
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
10-08-2009, 08:48 AM


Quote:
Originally Posted by brad View Post
The image is yours unless there is a different arrangement
Yup.

---------------------------
Bryan Lindsey
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
Permanently Banned
 
CaptainTom's Avatar
 
Posts: 15,341
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Tx,
Real First Name: Tom
Camera: canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 24

Likes Received LIKES Received: 5
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
10-08-2009, 08:55 AM


Quote:
Originally Posted by kenw View Post
slight correction: register them all at once. They were copyrighted the moment you took the pic, registered or not.
Yes, thank you.
Reply With Quote
  (#15) Old
Forum Master
 
ronocnikral's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,940
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wisteria Lane, Maine
Real First Name: Ron
Camera: Canon/Bronica/Mamiya TLR
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 4

Likes Received LIKES Received: 43
Likes Given LIKES Given: 5
10-08-2009, 08:57 AM


you also have a 90 day window from date of publication. it can get messy of establishing when that 90 days begins...so it is probably best to just send the images in right after you take them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
photo, photographer, property

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.