| Member
Posts: 96 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Chicago IL, Real First Name: Ramiro Camera: Nikon D300 Can Others Edit My Photos: No iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
08-09-2010, 01:23 PM
Wow! Thanx a bunch Don for sharing your ideas.
I kind of like the 1st choice you listed because it gives me the freedom, I think, to have different sessions (as I do now), get paid for my time and talent, then charge separate for what people want to buy, whether that is an a-la-carte or packages. I think that it can get more confusing for me to track and for the client to decide what to get if I have packages that include different kinds of sessions.
Maybe I should clarify how I have setup the studio. Basically, when we book the session, we also schedule the client's viewing/sales session, which is done via projection. This way people can book the session separate from any products, then after seeing the presentation we prepare, then we help them select which portraits are best suited for their needs. It is during the sales session that I am trying to figure out how to get the minimum required investement before they walk out the door.
Since I am leaning more to option 1, under that system, at which point do I charge the required minimum? or how to I ensure that they'll buy at least that?
I heard of another photographer that gives out paper proofs and puts a value of, say $1000 on those proofs. They get to keep them for 2-3 weeks then they have to bring them back, if they don't, the credit card they left to take out the proofs gets charged the $1000, after several attempts at trying to get the people to bring back their proofs of course. But by doing this, the photographer makes sure they will come back and buy actual portraits, not just proofs.
What I still can't see with that method, is if the people bring back the proofs and decide to buy nothing, then the photographer is still out of the minimum required investment. On the method above the photographer will basically need to charge a portion of the value of the proofs as "collateral" and have that be a credit towards portraits/product purchases.
Thoughts? |
| | |