Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Business Discussion > Business Talk


professional format

This is a discussion on professional format within the Business Talk forums, part of the Business Discussion category; I have heard this before that 4x6 is not a professional format. I personally beleive that but i was forced ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Forum Master
 
adirty1's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,292
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: austin(Hutto), Texas
Real First Name: adam
Camera: canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
professional format - 08-03-2006, 05:51 PM


I have heard this before that 4x6 is not a professional format. I personally beleive that but i was forced into selling them. However I am about to stop selling them and only sell 5x7's and up unless it's a wallet. plus i get to sell them frames and mattes.

I was wondering what yall thought about that whole 4x6 print debate
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Uber Poster
 
Silvernic's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,090
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ogden, UT,
Real First Name: Nic
Camera: D300
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to Silvernic
08-03-2006, 09:10 PM


I was just visiting with someone about this who cropped all his 4x6's down to 4x5 before giving them to customers because he felt it looked more professional. I kinda thought he was a little nuts, but by the next time that I picked up prints, I started to agree with his thinking. Anything to differentiate yourself from the prints their picking up on their own from costco.

---------------------------
Nic - D200
I think you'll be OK, they have a thin candy shell. I'm surprised you didn't know that.
www.silverstreetphoto.com
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Uber Poster
 
Michelle Allmon's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,111
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Six Mile Run, PA,
Real First Name: Michelle
Camera: Canon 30D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
08-03-2006, 09:24 PM


hmm. i never thought about that. but what can you do with a 4x5?
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Uber Poster
 
boxofrocks's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,654
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Coppell, Texas
Real First Name: Tom
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 11

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via Skype™ to boxofrocks
08-03-2006, 09:48 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Michelle Allmon
hmm. i never thought about that. but what can you do with a 4x5?
A lot of the pre-cut folios take 4x5s.




---------------------------
thomasmanchester.com

To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
-Sir Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
tone-bending bas%@rd
 
jeffkohn's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,648
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Jeff
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 4

Likes Received LIKES Received: 32
Likes Given LIKES Given: 22
08-03-2006, 10:40 PM


The whole notion of crop ratios is pretty screwed up when it comes to printing and framing if you ask me. I guess the closest thing we have to a standard "standard" the 4:5 ratio, owing mostly to large-format cameras I think. This is where we get 8x10, 16x20, 24x30, and even 40x50 prints from. But then there are the oddball sizes like 5x7, 11x14, and 20x24 that seem to have no reason to exist except make printing and framing more difficult. 4x6 at least makes sense, seeing as how it matches the 35mm film format (and digital too of course).

For portraits, I personally think 5x7 is the ideal from a strictly aesthetic viewpoint more often than not. 4:5 is just a little too sqaure for my taste, and sometimes 3:2 is too "skinny" although it can work well for some compositions. For landscapes I generally tend to prefer a wider aspect ratio but will occasionally use 4:5 if it suits the composition.

I don't really think one crop is any more professional than another though.

---------------------------
Jeff Kohn | The Majestic Landscape | Blog | More Images
"The capacity to compose images is really the capacity to give coherence to sensed experience" - Robert Motherwell
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Uber Poster
 
Michelle Allmon's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,111
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Six Mile Run, PA,
Real First Name: Michelle
Camera: Canon 30D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
08-03-2006, 10:56 PM


Quote:
5x7, 11x14, and 20x24
yeah, i've always wondered where those sizes came from. 5x7 in particular, so popular.

that's a pretty sweet folio.
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Forum Master
 
adirty1's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,292
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: austin(Hutto), Texas
Real First Name: adam
Camera: canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
08-04-2006, 09:08 AM


the 11x14 is an odd size when it comes to framing. normally i frame it in 16x20.

I miss the days of square format and my 6x7...
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Premium Member
 
Wil_Bloodworth's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,934
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Frisco, Texas
Real First Name: Wil
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 10

Likes Received LIKES Received: 9
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
08-04-2006, 09:15 AM


Non-professional? Think about that for a second. Professional simply means that someone is willing to pay for it. If the customer pays for 4x6 prints then 4x6 prints are professional. Anyone saying otherwise has their nose too high in the air and needs a reality check. Who cares what the print size is? The purpose of photography is to capture a moment in time and to be creative. All this "X size is better than Y size" talk is just a waste of time. Move on.

- Wil

---------------------------
Portrait Site: www.ParkImaging.com
Commercial Site: www.DallasCommercialPhoto.com
flickr
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Forum Regular
 
Bruce M. Morris's Avatar
 
Posts: 846
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West Fort Worth, Texas
Real First Name: Bruce
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 5
Likes Given LIKES Given: 11
08-04-2006, 09:26 AM


Does everyone remember that the usual print size from negatives used to be 3.5x5? which scales up even to 5x7? customers wanted the larger size without paying for 5x7's so the Great Yellow Father came out with 4x6 as their standard size prints. Played Hob with my file system, how about ya'lls?

---------------------------
Bruce M. Morris
Cowtown Photography
Fort Worth, TX
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
format, professional

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.