Here's my normal routine for client proofs:
1. Shoot the photos
2. Go home, separate the wheat from the chaff
3. Edit all of the good photos (sometimes I present several different options for the same shot... like b/w, desaturated, and sepia)
4. Post all proofs online
5. Client emails me their print choices from those presented
6. Crop and send selections to the lab
7. Deliver prints to client
Now, I have a client who chose photos with processing options that I didn't present her in the proof set.
Example:
IMG_1001_antique.jpg was presented
IMG_1001_bw.jpg was presented
IMG_1002.jpg was presented
IMG_1003_sepia.jpg was presented
Client orders IMG_1001_sepia.jpg
Do any of you run into this situation and if so how do you handle it? I'm beginning to think it's better to just present the client the single best look for a particular photo and leave it at that. I spent about 5 hours editing the proofs and another 3 hours pulling together her large print order and now she has chosen 4 photos with processing types that I didn't offer her so I'd have to reprocess the files.
She also did this for crops... i.e. I presented a photo that was shot and cropped with the rule of thirds in mind (since I was shooting on a black background there is negative space on one side of the frame) and she asked me to center it.
Is the customer always right or do we have the right to say "no" because ultimately the work is a reflection of us?
If this sounds like whining to you let me know. If this is business as usual for the industry I'll just suck it up and do what the client asks.
T.