| Forum Regular
Posts: 798 Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Garland, TX, Real First Name: Stephen iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
01-01-2007, 11:40 AM
I notice the page referenced says "All requests for filming and/or photography in city-owned parks....".
If it was just one photographer, one model, I'd try to get them to clarify what this applies to. The way it is written, every tourist that snaps a snapshot needs to pay $200 for a permit, and that is surely not the intent. They may decide this on commercial vs amateur, or on whether a tripod is used, or on other random factors, and you'd just have to ask to see.
I've seen a similar issue come up in national parks. Although the regulations are written in such a way that any pro requires a permit, I think they really only apply it to where you have multiple people doing stuff- one guy with a camera they don't worry about. I've read that NYC requires a permit for anything with a tripod, pro or not.
The problem with these regs is that they are set up assuming a certain kind of activity. If you have a dozen people and a lot of equipment on the site, then $200 a day is a drop in the bucket. But if it's one photographer and one model for 30 minutes, that's a rather unreasonable way to work things.
I did also notice this on that website:
"12.12.06 PLEASE NOTE: The San Antonio River will be drained along the River Walk January 2 - 9 for annual cleaning. Please make note of this when scheduling any production on the River Walk."
---------------------------
I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I— I took the one less traveled by,
and then it petered out and I had to retrace my steps and wasted half a day.
|
| | |