Judge Joe Brown rules for photographer

[CaptainTom]

The claimant says they hired a wedding photographer for $200. The photographer says it was $400. The claimant says the photos weren't good. Judge Joe says the photographer gave you a CD with the photos and there was no agreement to do post processing. Judge Joe said "just take this to a good lab and for about $2500 they will make these into good photos." What do you expect when you pay the photographer what you probably tipped the DJ.

ruling for the photographer.

implied - you get what you pay for.

[toverman]

I've noticed a couple of those judge shows have featured low-cost photographers defending themselves. Judge Maria Lopez ruled for a photog, too, because it clearly stated what was expected of her in her contract. I mean, the photos they showed were awful, but at least she covered herself legally. I think her fee was $400 or something.

[jasonhuang]

awesome. i'm going to find this episode and show it at all my client meetings!

[Davidtxs]

Originally Posted by CaptainTom

The claimant says they hired a wedding photographer for $200. The photographer says it was $400. The claimant says the photos weren't good. Judge Joe says the photographer gave you a CD with the photos and there was no agreement to do post processing. Judge Joe said "just take this to a good lab and for about $2500 they will make these into good photos." What do you expect when you pay the photographer what you probably tipped the DJ.

ruling for the photographer.

implied - you get what you pay for.

NO WONDER you missed the P38 you left to go home and watch Judge Joe

[Killeenguy]

these are the kinda of threads I want to see more of.

[barP]

that right there is funny!

wp.

[ndsimm]

Glad to see the judges ruling for the photographer. In the past they used to rule in favor of the couple, but I think most photographers are getting smart and getting stuff in writing....
sad that the photographers are so cheap though.....