Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Photography Information > The Darkroom


35mm developing: My negatives are showing up way contrasty

This is a discussion on 35mm developing: My negatives are showing up way contrasty within the The Darkroom forums, part of the Photography Information category; Hi new to the forum.. I met up with Lee last week great guy.... I've developed 120 film with no ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Member
 
heespharm's Avatar
 
Posts: 120
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: houston, Texas
Real First Name: ted
Camera: canon t1i, Shenhao 4x5, cent. univ. 8x10, tachi 8x10, hassy 500c, rb67, nikon f2, canon 3, bessa r2
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
35mm developing: My negatives are showing up way contrasty - 12-08-2009, 06:59 PM


Hi new to the forum.. I met up with Lee last week great guy....

I've developed 120 film with no problems

So I've had problems lately with 35mm... I've been shooting neopan 400 pushed to 800 lately and my negatives always come out too contrasty.... i mean muddy and contrasty (like black and white)... I don't know why!!! I thought It was because the developer I was using but it turns out developing times are the same across the board for 35/120 film...

could it be my agitation??? i use 2-3 inversions every minute... (should I be swirling???)

Do you think my developing time is too long??? concentration is too high??

I currently use d76, rodinal and ilfosol-3 (which actually i don't use because everthing comes out crap from it)

please help

WHAT ARE THINGS THAT LEAD TO TOO CONTRASTY NEGATIVES??
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Uber Poster
 
KJ Smith's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,123
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Kevin
Camera: Yes
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 83
Likes Given LIKES Given: 14
12-08-2009, 07:07 PM


You are underexposing film, then over developing it.

That leads to contasty negatives.

Tell us what developer and what times and we can be of more help.





Did you say you meet Lee? and he is a nice guy??

Hmmmmmmm.

---------------------------
Kevin
C&C always appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Member
 
heespharm's Avatar
 
Posts: 120
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: houston, Texas
Real First Name: ted
Camera: canon t1i, Shenhao 4x5, cent. univ. 8x10, tachi 8x10, hassy 500c, rb67, nikon f2, canon 3, bessa r2
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-08-2009, 07:13 PM


neopan 400 pushed to 800 in d76 1:1 at 13 minutes
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Uber Poster
 
KJ Smith's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,123
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Kevin
Camera: Yes
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 83
Likes Given LIKES Given: 14
12-08-2009, 07:15 PM


post a pic if you can.

---------------------------
Kevin
C&C always appreciated.

Last edited by KJ Smith; 12-08-2009 at 07:20 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Uber Poster
 
KJ Smith's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,123
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Kevin
Camera: Yes
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 83
Likes Given LIKES Given: 14
12-08-2009, 07:20 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by heespharm View Post
neopan 400 pushed to 800 in d76 1:1 at 13 minutes
You should have gone 13.5 minutes @ 68f

The chart for small tanks says continuous first minute, 5 sec, every minute thereafter.

http://www.fujifilmusa.com/shared/bi...mDataGuide.pdf

Do you want to hear my buy Kodak and make it easy speech ????

---------------------------
Kevin
C&C always appreciated.

Last edited by KJ Smith; 12-09-2009 at 08:22 AM..
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Member
 
heespharm's Avatar
 
Posts: 120
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: houston, Texas
Real First Name: ted
Camera: canon t1i, Shenhao 4x5, cent. univ. 8x10, tachi 8x10, hassy 500c, rb67, nikon f2, canon 3, bessa r2
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-21-2009, 01:23 AM


sure just bought 100' of trix 400
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Uber Poster
 
KJ Smith's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,123
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Kevin
Camera: Yes
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 83
Likes Given LIKES Given: 14
12-21-2009, 06:37 AM


Tri X is fine. But it is an older film.

TMax 400 would be best. Especially if you want to shoot it at 800.

It is the same, 400,800, makes no difference. No push involved.

---------------------------
Kevin
C&C always appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
venchka's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,005
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston mostly, Texas
Real First Name: Wayne
Camera: 6x7 Pinhole. Good enough for me.
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 70
Likes Given LIKES Given: 6
Send a message via ICQ to venchka
12-21-2009, 08:28 AM


Contrasty subjects lead to contrasty negatives. The reverse is true.

35mm & 120 film don't always require the same developing times. What do you put 120 film in?

Underexpose. Overdevelop. Increase contrast. That is at the heart of the Zone System. when you run across flat even light, no contrast, then you start expansion or increasing contrast.

The opposite is true as well. Overexpose. Underdevelop. Reduce contrast.

Why do people buy perfectly good ISO 400 film and try to make it work at 800 for no reason? Or is there a reason? Fuji Neopan 1600 might work better at 800. Tmax 3200 at 1000 works well in Xtol 1:3 for 19 minutes with continuous agitation.

Use some of the Tri-X for proper testing. Find your very own personal film speed and personal developing time. Here is a clue: The real speed of Tri-X when it was first invented was ASA 200. Another clue: Arista Premium 100 and 400 135-36 rolls of film from Freestyle are redranded Kodak Plus-X and Tri-X. About the same price as buying the real thing in bulk.

Lee's a nice guy. Welcome to the club!

---------------------------
Wayne
Deep in the darkest heart of the East Texas Rain forest. Fledging Apprentice Wannabe Analog Activist
My Gallery | FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
He's dead, Jim!
 
wclavey's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,632
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Far West Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Westley
Camera: Olympus E-30
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 45
Likes Given LIKES Given: 51
12-21-2009, 02:59 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by venchka View Post
Why do people buy perfectly good ISO 400 film and try to make it work at 800 for no reason? Or is there a reason? Fuji Neopan 1600 might work better at 800. Tmax 3200 at 1000 works well in Xtol 1:3 for 19 minutes with continuous agitation.
Actually, the cognoscenti all know that Diafine is the way to do that without the boost in contrast...

---------------------------
I welcome comments on any picture I post... Thanks.
Tripod - (n., archaic.) 1. Image stabilization
Wes Clavey, WB2SVF | My LUG Gallery Album
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
venchka's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,005
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston mostly, Texas
Real First Name: Wayne
Camera: 6x7 Pinhole. Good enough for me.
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 70
Likes Given LIKES Given: 6
Send a message via ICQ to venchka
12-21-2009, 03:08 PM


Perhaps. Does Diafine boost Neopan 400 all the way to 800? Or somewhere less than 1 full stop?

The folks on the bleeding edge of minimum exposure and maximum development are letting their Tri-X soak in Rodinal undisturbed for an hour or longer.

Rodinal 1:100 - Page 7 - Rangefinderforum.com

---------------------------
Wayne
Deep in the darkest heart of the East Texas Rain forest. Fledging Apprentice Wannabe Analog Activist
My Gallery | FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
Uber Poster
 
KJ Smith's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,123
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Kevin
Camera: Yes
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 83
Likes Given LIKES Given: 14
12-21-2009, 03:15 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by wclavey View Post
Actually, the cognoscenti all know that Diafine is the way to do that without the boost in contrast...
Why not use TMax 400 rated at 800 and be done. No push needed.


I always thought Accufine was for pushing.

---------------------------
Kevin
C&C always appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
Uber Poster
 
KJ Smith's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,123
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Kevin
Camera: Yes
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 83
Likes Given LIKES Given: 14
12-21-2009, 03:16 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by wclavey View Post
Actually, the cognoscenti
What island nation are they from ?????....

---------------------------
Kevin
C&C always appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
venchka's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,005
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston mostly, Texas
Real First Name: Wayne
Camera: 6x7 Pinhole. Good enough for me.
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 70
Likes Given LIKES Given: 6
Send a message via ICQ to venchka
12-21-2009, 03:21 PM


LMAO! I love it!

Westley, you're the TMY-2 Guru. Have you tried 800?????????? In a real developer???????????????? Break out the Tmax developer & expose a few sheets at 800. Report back. Or does the 800 thing only apply to little film?

---------------------------
Wayne
Deep in the darkest heart of the East Texas Rain forest. Fledging Apprentice Wannabe Analog Activist
My Gallery | FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
venchka's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,005
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston mostly, Texas
Real First Name: Wayne
Camera: 6x7 Pinhole. Good enough for me.
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 70
Likes Given LIKES Given: 6
Send a message via ICQ to venchka
12-21-2009, 03:44 PM


One stop is a baby push. Plus-X 2 stops to 400 in Xtol 1:3 is nice.

Here's some more in the Tri-X & Rodinal saga:

Quote:
Originally Posted by merciful View Post
I'm feeling Christmas-y, so here ya go. I'm not really so sure what was posted before, but here're a few of my favourite TX/high-ISO/Rodinal shots.

3200.
Rangefinderforum.com - View Single Post - Push it; push it real good.

---------------------------
Wayne
Deep in the darkest heart of the East Texas Rain forest. Fledging Apprentice Wannabe Analog Activist
My Gallery | FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
Reply With Quote
  (#15) Old
He's dead, Jim!
 
wclavey's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,632
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Far West Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Westley
Camera: Olympus E-30
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 45
Likes Given LIKES Given: 51
12-21-2009, 09:12 PM


I always shoot my TMY-2 at 800 and develop normally, whether in Tmax Developer or Diafine...

---------------------------
I welcome comments on any picture I post... Thanks.
Tripod - (n., archaic.) 1. Image stabilization
Wes Clavey, WB2SVF | My LUG Gallery Album
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
35mm, contrasty, developing, negatives, showing

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.