Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Photography Information > Equipment Talk


Best Lenses for my Canon T1i

This is a discussion on Best Lenses for my Canon T1i within the Equipment Talk forums, part of the Photography Information category; I have done lots of research and read thousand of posts and reviews which leads me to want to acquire ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Member
 
Jred's Avatar
 
Posts: 72
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Htown, Texas
Real First Name: John
Camera: Canon T1i
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Best Lenses for my Canon T1i - 12-31-2009, 12:29 PM


I have done lots of research and read thousand of posts and reviews which leads me to want to acquire the following lenses.

First tho I would like to explain that I want to experience all types of photography including but not limited to Architecture, Landscape, Macro, Portrait, Sports and Nature. My emphasis is probably more nature sports and architecture, although I love macro as well.

I have a t1i with the kit lens and have purchased a EF 100 F/2.8 Macro USM.

At the top of my list are the following;

1. EF 70-200mm F/2.8L USM, FM rating 9.8, priced new from $1220 and used @ $800ish. Pros-Low light fast focus and sharp. Cons-Bulky and no IS.

2. EF 50mm F/1.4 USM, FM rating 9.0, priced new from $360 and used @ 320ish. Pros-Sharp,lightweight, compact, value and Bokeh. Cons-Build,motor issues and Wide open focusing.

3. Tamron AF 28-75MM F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF), FM rating 8.7, priced new from $460 and used @ $350ish. Pros-Sharpness, contrast and value. Cons-Build AF-issues.

4. SIGMA 12-24mm F/4.5-5.6 Ex DG Aspherical HSM, FM rating 8.7, priced new from $750 and used @ $500ish. Pros-Sharpness and build. Cons-Slow focus and heavy.


OTHER HQ LENSES:

EF 70-200mm F/4.0L USM - may be the best value but I wanted more speed.
EF-S 10-22mm F/3.5-4.5 USM - highly rated but price and build are a concern.
EF 24-70mm F/2.8L USM - highly rated but heavy and pricey.
EF 100-400mm F/4.5-5.6L IS USM - highly rated, this lens covers a lot of ground and is lightweight but @$1600+ I am concerned that it may not get used. It is also not a low light lens.
EF 28-300mm F/3.5-5.6L IS USM - highly rated but very expensive $2400+ has great IQ and range but is not a walk around lens.


Since I am trying to get back in to photography after 25+ years away, I wanted to get some experience with many different lenses rather than focus on a few. Also, although price is somewhat of an issue, quality and value were more important. The way I figure it, I can always sell and upgrade if I need to.

Finally, should I be more concerned about the body? What do you FF guys think? In deference to Nikon, Pentax and Olympus, I have already gone down the slippery Canon slope.

Please comment and critique my thinking.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Da Juan and Only Moderator
 
KenJulio's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,262
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Ken
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 28

Likes Received LIKES Received: 136
Likes Given LIKES Given: 169
12-31-2009, 12:31 PM


Just curious, why not the 24-105 f4? I hear a lot of good things about it

---------------------------
Support Pixtus by Purchasing Your Gear from: B&H Photo, Amazon, or Adorama
Our Forum Rules | Report posts that break the Site Rules
Dark Sky Finder Thread
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Colt Frontier SnapShooter
 
Hogleg 44's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,032
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: N. Richland Hills, (Ft. Worth) Texas, Texas
Real First Name: Paul
Camera: Canon 1DMkIII
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 13
Likes Given LIKES Given: 7
12-31-2009, 12:37 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by ken74 View Post
Just curious, why not the 24-105 f4? I hear a lot of good things about it
Yep. That is my most used lens. Small, Light and very sharp.

---------------------------
Paul A. Valentine
Valentine-Photography ♥ ♥ Valentine Services
Photograph! An immediate and unpretentious capturing and freezing of a moment in time.
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Uber Poster
 
KJ Smith's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,050
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Kevin
Camera: Yes
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 63
Likes Given LIKES Given: 10
12-31-2009, 01:05 PM


If I were you I would mount a 70-200 2.8 on that camera before I buy one.

That is a big heavy lens on a small light camera. It may be hard to grip comfortably.

---------------------------
Kevin
C&C always appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Premium Member
 
rockpics's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,431
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Abilene, Texas
Real First Name: Jill
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 13
Likes Given LIKES Given: 17
12-31-2009, 01:47 PM


I have the Tamron 28-75, and it is great on full frame. On a crop format camera, I think I'd go with the Canon 17-55 f2.8. It is more expensive than the Tamron, but it has IS. Unless you like ultra-wide, you might not need the Sigma 12-24 if you got the Canon 17-55.

Last edited by rockpics; 12-31-2009 at 01:49 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Forum Master
 
Daniel W.'s Avatar
 
Posts: 1,939
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, New York
Real First Name: Dan
Camera: Pinhole
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 7

Likes Received LIKES Received: 5
Likes Given LIKES Given: 5
12-31-2009, 02:02 PM


Shoot with a lens too long and you'll be weak at composing wides. Shoot too wide, you'll be weak at following action.

17-55/2.8+70-200+35/2, all you'll ever need.

---------------------------
Hasselblads are Fuji!
dwpblog.notlong.com
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Member
 
Demonic's Avatar
 
Posts: 152
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Texarkana,
Real First Name: Scott
Camera: Canon EOS 7D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to Demonic Send a message via Yahoo to Demonic
12-31-2009, 02:17 PM


I had my 24-70 f2.8 on my XTi for a while, even that lens was hard to handle on that body, really needed a grip. I couldn't imagine a 70-200 2.8 on it without a grip.

As far as my 24-70 i love it, a great general purpose lens. 70-200 2.8 IS is next on my list.

---------------------------
| Canon EOS 7D | 24-70mm f/2.8L | 75-300 F/4-5.6 | 50mm f/1.8 | 580EX II | 430EX | Vanguard Tracker 3 Tripod |

Photography does not make me money, but its my escape from life and that is priceless.

I Try not to suck.. see?
http://demonphoto.com
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Senior Member
 
dryicerx's Avatar
 
Posts: 408
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, TX, Texas
Real First Name: J
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-31-2009, 02:27 PM


Since you have a crop sensor, instead of the 24-70L, I'd suggest you look in to the 17-55 IS 2.8. It may not be a L glass, but the quality says otherwise (and price), it truly is amazing, lighter. The 24-70 on the crop ended up being too long for general walk around...

From the rest of the list, another vote for the 70-200... just a marvellous lens.
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Uber Poster
 
L Stegall's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,989
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Real First Name: Lisa
Camera: Canon 5D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 4

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-31-2009, 02:44 PM


If I was starting my lens collection at this point, I think it's hard to beat the 24-105 f/4 L lens as a good, all around quality lens to start with (I am seriously considering adding it to my bag and I have the 16-35 f/2.8 and the 24-70 f/2.8 already). That 24-105 would be my first lens and then I'd work out from there. In the meantime, that lens will give you a good range of focal lengths and will hold it's value very well. Another lens you may consider if you want something longer is the 200 mm f/2.8 L prime - I found with a zoom, I was usually at the end of the focal length anyway and the prime is smaller, lighter, fast and sharp, not to mention less $$$$ than the 70-200 zoom.
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
Senior Member
 
linque's Avatar
 
Posts: 330
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Scott
Camera: Canon 40d
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 5

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-31-2009, 02:47 PM


I don't know if you're a podcast listener, but they had a short discussion on the topic of lenses to use for video on Photofocus (episode 25) recently. Here is a link to the show notes. If you're going to shoot video, you might want to start with a lens that does that well first.

Last edited by linque; 12-31-2009 at 02:50 PM.. Reason: misread original post
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
Uber Poster
 
L Stegall's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,989
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Real First Name: Lisa
Camera: Canon 5D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 4

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-31-2009, 02:52 PM


Oh, and you asked about the body. I've had both crop and FF bodies. My advice is always to get the glass over the body. Once you have the glass and want FF, have it it. In the meantime, the bodies come and go these days and the glass lasts a lot longer, regardless of FF or not.
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
Member
 
Eyemfaster's Avatar
 
Posts: 107
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sugar Land, Texas
Real First Name: Michael
Camera: Canon 40D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to Eyemfaster
12-31-2009, 04:05 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel W. View Post
Shoot with a lens too long and you'll be weak at composing wides. Shoot too wide, you'll be weak at following action.

17-55/2.8+70-200+35/2, all you'll ever need.
Agreed. I just picked up a 17-55mm f/2.8 IS, and I can't believe I waited so long. Awesome walk around lens. 50mm f/1.4 is next on my list, then after that a 70-200, and i'm done.
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
Senior Member
 
linque's Avatar
 
Posts: 330
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Scott
Camera: Canon 40d
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 5

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-31-2009, 05:33 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Eyemfaster View Post
Agreed. I just picked up a 17-55mm f/2.8 IS, and I can't believe I waited so long. Awesome walk around lens.
I've really been thinking about the 17-55 f2.8. I've read that it is even slightly sharper than the 24-70 f2.8 L. Is there any problem mounting that to a 7D? I know you can't use them on a full frame like the 5D, and I know they'll work on my 40D (1.6x crop), but the 7D is a 1.3x crop.
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
venchka's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,936
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston mostly, Texas
Real First Name: Wayne
Camera: 6x7 Pinhole. Good enough for me.
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 54
Likes Given LIKES Given: 6
Send a message via ICQ to venchka
12-31-2009, 06:04 PM


A sensor challenged DSLR won't do everything. You can throw lenses at it all day and still won't do everything.

---------------------------
Wayne
Deep in the darkest heart of the East Texas Rain forest. Fledging Apprentice Wannabe Analog Activist
My Gallery | FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
Reply With Quote
  (#15) Old
Forum Master
 
preames's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,478
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sugar Land, Texas
Real First Name: Patrick
Camera: Canon 7D, 1DIV
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 36
Likes Given LIKES Given: 9
12-31-2009, 07:38 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by linque View Post
I've really been thinking about the 17-55 f2.8. I've read that it is even slightly sharper than the 24-70 f2.8 L. Is there any problem mounting that to a 7D? I know you can't use them on a full frame like the 5D, and I know they'll work on my 40D (1.6x crop), but the 7D is a 1.3x crop.
Actually the 7D is 1.6 just like the 40D...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
canon, lenses, t1i

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.