$100 ExpoDisc vs $8 General Brand for Canon 7DThis is a discussion on $100 ExpoDisc vs $8 General Brand for Canon 7D within the Equipment Talk forums, part of the Photography Information category; Would a device like the ExpoDisc give me better white balances on a Canon EOS 7D? Or does the 7D ...
(#1)
| | Member
Posts: 110 Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Houston, Texas Real First Name: Scott Camera: Canon EOS 7D Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 1 LIKES Given: 1 | $100 ExpoDisc vs $8 General Brand for Canon 7D -
03-18-2010, 03:06 PM
Would a device like the ExpoDisc give me better white balances on a Canon EOS 7D? Or does the 7D do a good enough job with white balance that an ExpoDisc would only offer marginal improvement?
If the ExpoDisc is recommended, how about a significantly less expensive one, such as the General Brand White Balance Lens Cap? ($8 including shipping)
I generally have the attitude, "Buy the best, and only cry once" -- however, if such a large price difference is not really warranted, then I'd rather get the cheap one.
I have a similar question for the ExpoImaging Ray Flash ($199) vs the Coco Ring Flash ($50). If the Ray Flash produces significantly better results, and/or will far outlast the Coco Ring Flash, then I'm willing to spend 4x -- but if the results are comparable, or if the Coco build quality wouldn't significantly degrade its lifetime compared to the Ray Flash, then I'd rather take the cheaper one. | | | | | Sponsored Links | Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
|
(#2)
| | Premium Member
Posts: 5,701 Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Houston, Texas Real First Name: Tom Camera: GoPro2 Can Others Edit My Photos: No iTrader Rating: 7 LIKES Received: 424 LIKES Given: 296 |
03-18-2010, 03:44 PM
I take between 2-5 thousand pictures a week.
I have never, ever used a gray card of any kind for still photography. I still don't feel the need to have one. YMMV.
I also wouldn't buy any cheap ring flash. | | | |
(#3)
| | Forum Regular
Posts: 680 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Houston (Clear Lake), Texas Real First Name: Russ Camera: Pentax, Olympus Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 4 LIKES Given: 10 |
03-18-2010, 04:08 PM
I'll agree with Thomas about the white balance. I found an Expo disc for cheap when Ritz was consolidating stores, but I hardly ever use it. I guess if I was in a studio situation where consistent WB was absolutely essential, I'd be more picky. However, the light constantly changes in all my shots and I'm shooting a little bit of everything. Even when I get "the right" WB versus what "I think" is the right WB, the results aren't that different. To me color tweaks are like saturation, exposure and other tweaks. They're all subjective up to a point.
As for the cheap ring flash, I just bought one for $40 off of ebay and I've been happy with it for that price. I've never used a $200 ring flash, so I can't really compare. Ring flash is a "nice to have" for me right now. If I find it lacking, then I'll pay more for a better one, but I'm not sure I'll see the need for it. | | | |
(#4)
| | Member
Posts: 110 Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Houston, Texas Real First Name: Scott Camera: Canon EOS 7D Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 1 LIKES Given: 1 |
03-18-2010, 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Campbell I also wouldn't buy any cheap ring flash. | The two choices I listed aren't ring flashes, per se, but reflectors to redirect the light from, say, a 580ex, into a series of reflectors arranged in a ring around the lens.
The results I've seen in sample photos with the ExpoImaging one look very good -- probably not as good as a dedicated ring flash, but good for somebody like me who is a pretty determined amateur, but not really making any money off my photography. I just want to know if the cheaper Coco reflector is essentially comparable to the 4x as expensive Ray Flash. | | | |
(#5)
| | Forum Master
Posts: 1,337 Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Houston, Texas Real First Name: Bryan Camera: Nikon Can Others Edit My Photos: No iTrader Rating: 2 LIKES Received: 48 LIKES Given: 0 |
04-16-2010, 05:04 PM
I have the same question. I'm going to start using a WB filter, just wondering if the $$$ is worth it to go from a cheapie to the brand-name Expodisc.
Has anyone compared the Expodisc with one of the cheaper knockoffs?
---------------------------
Bryan Lindsey
| | | |
(#6)
| | Member
Posts: 166 Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Garland, Texas Real First Name: Phil Camera: Canon MKIII Can Others Edit My Photos: No iTrader Rating: 2 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
04-16-2010, 07:30 PM
Before you spend the money try using a coffee filter over the lens. I've experimented with it and it does a good job. I need to do more testing to be sure. I can't say that it would be better the he more expensive products, but it did a better job then the preset WB. | | | |
(#7)
| | Forum Master
Posts: 1,043 Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Leander, Texas Real First Name: Nathan Camera: Olympus E3 Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 2 LIKES Received: 20 LIKES Given: 13 |
04-16-2010, 07:40 PM
I like having a custom WB. Saves time when doing all jpeg shooting and making the pictures more consistent. Although it is murder when the lights don't stay the same color temp the whole time.
And I agree with Phil - use a white coffee filter and see what you think. It is just as good as any of the other filters and basically free.
About the ring flash - that is what you are getting even if it is powered by your current flash. I went with an AlienBees version for about twice the price of your "expensive" one, but it truly is a totally different beast. I really like it a lot. It is most certainly a more powerful piece of equipment, but you lose out in the portability department. | | | |
(#8)
| | Forum Master
Posts: 1,003 Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Pearland, Texas Real First Name: Marius Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: No iTrader Rating: 19 LIKES Received: 30 LIKES Given: 9 |
04-16-2010, 09:16 PM
If you are shooting purely in JPEG then a grey card can really help cut down your workflow. But if you're shooting in RAW then WB is kinda moot.
If the Fong dong is a glorified tupperware then the expodisc is a glorified tissue paper.
Last edited by kayumangi; 04-16-2010 at 09:22 PM..
| | | |
(#9)
| | Uber Poster
Posts: 2,740 Join Date: May 2006 Location: Keller, Texas Real First Name: Rich Camera: A disposable from CVS Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 84 LIKES Given: 14 |
04-16-2010, 09:52 PM
the cheapy lens cap fades and browns with age. Get a good grey card | | | |
(#10)
| | Forum Regular
Posts: 631 Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: San Antonio, Texas Real First Name: John Camera: Canon 5dMKII Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 2 LIKES Given: 0 |
04-17-2010, 10:33 AM
I believe the difference in prices between the Expodisc and the General Brands, probably has a lot to do with the consistency between batches of the piece. I know on Expodiscs ad's they talk about the blends of plastic to ensure the accuracy of the product. | | | |
(#11)
| | Uber Poster
Posts: 2,701 Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Killeen, Texas Real First Name: Andy Camera: Canon 7D, 5D Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 8 LIKES Received: 76 LIKES Given: 1 |
04-17-2010, 10:56 AM
I have the Expo Disc. If you get one, get the biggest you need and simply hold it against smaller lens. The Expo is supposed to be aimed at the light source. That may or may not be convenient. I just find I don't use mine enough but I also shoot more RAW than JPG other than sports where I shoot JPG.
The 7D tells you to use a white card to get a custom white balance. In Canon's wisdom, later in the manual they say an 18% gray card may be more accurate. Personally I think a collapsible gray card may get used more and I've thought of buying one.
One thing I read on the Shoot Smarter site was that "camera manufacturers never say, get this plastic thing for white balance. "
Back to the OP, I wouldn't go cheap. I just feel like more goes into the better products, that is materials, R&D and quality control. | | | |
(#12)
| | Forum Regular
Posts: 554 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Mesa, Az., Real First Name: Carl Camera: Nikons iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
04-17-2010, 12:13 PM
If you really wanna get into to this, try this link. Robin Myers Imaging: Digital Gray Card™
There is a lot of info on Robin's website. Like Andrew Rodney, he IS the real deal when it comes to color management. | | | |
(#13)
| | Forum Regular
Posts: 554 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Mesa, Az., Real First Name: Carl Camera: Nikons iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
04-17-2010, 06:44 PM
I should have included this in the post above, but, I didn't, so here it is. ExpoDisc is not all that great if accuracy is your goal. Robin Myers Imaging: ExpoDisc™ | | | |
(#14)
| | Forum Regular
Posts: 649 Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Plano, Texas Real First Name: Warren Camera: Nikon Shooter Can Others Edit My Photos: No iTrader Rating: 10 LIKES Received: 29 LIKES Given: 6 |
04-17-2010, 07:21 PM
I have used the lid of a lightspere, a knockoff wb disc, the real expo disc (my 2nd has one), and a grey card.
The knock-off, and lightspere lid do ok.... Expo Disc is a bit better, but consistency in light was always an issue. As of late I have gone to a grey card and I find the results to be much more consistent than with the various caps and filters. FWIW, my 2nd with the expo disc rarely uses his now with the implementation of the grey card. | | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Google Sponsors | Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
| |
Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc. |