Quote:
Originally Posted by darktiger The specs does not impress me. I think I rather have that fuji x10 in that price range...
I think it is not really talked about is because people get other p&s such as the S90-S100 or G10-G12 for their small camera needs... |
Yup, fully agree. Your whole post is spot on.
And that's what I'm saying. People get hung up on megapixels and other "specs".
Sometimes though, it's not about what the camera has, but what it doesn't have.
Look at the M9. It's almost barren in comparison to all other digital cameras when it comes to buttons and features. Sure, it has a great sensor. But what else about it's specs stand out? Even cheap P&S cameras do so much more. The screen sucks, no video, no "scene modes", it's no speed demon in writing images to the card, indoor white balance has issues, etc. Would I give up the M9 for any of those other cameras? Heck no. Because it just "works" so well. Dedicated controls for aperture, shutterspeed and iso is all a camera needs. When the camera gets out of the way and becomes an extension of the photographer, this is when you know you have a winner. Most Ricoh GRD and GX users will tell you this is what its like to own one.
For me personally, if I'm going to walk out of the house with a p&s instead of a dslr, it HAS to function just like my dlsr, AND produce images I'm happy with. I don't want to feel like I'm using a P&S. I've owned some of the better ones like the Panny Lumix LX-3/LX-5 line, and played with some of the Canons and such. But IMHO, no one GETS it like Ricoh does.
Of course I could go on and on, but it's one of those things where if you don't partake, you just won't "get it" either.
I would suggest reading the full article and ignoring the specs for now. Everything the writer loves about it you will see echoed over and over by other Ricoh owners.