Quote:
Originally Posted by slickshooter Robert
I have thought about another kayak for shooting up close.The sit in kayaks offer lots of protection for you camera gear.You can glide up to subjects very closely with a kayak.Lots of photogs on Fred Miranda use them.I used to have a ocean kayak that you sit on top of for diving.I used it 10 years and caught many a lobster while living in Florida.I only flipped it one time and that was in the very beginning.Sit in kayaks offer more stability and are available with molding that seals out water around your body if you do actually flip.If my back was n't giving me so much trouble now I would consider getting one just for the photo opportunities they present.
As far as investing in a lens;that would be my first goal as glass is the name of the game.Also if you purchase a high quality lens,it will never decrease in value as long as you take care of it.My lens has increased in value in the year and a half I have owned it. |
All points you make are good, I've seen alot of the stuff done on fm from kayaks, and here's my thinking on them.
1) the good ones iirc were over 2k, which is out of my budget.
2) I'm not the most gracefully balanced person on the planet
On the glass, here's what i have been thinking about.
My wide is lacking I have a 18-135 but it's slow and that lens lacks contrast and punch. Also have a 28 2.8d but it's not very wide on dx. Use it more like a "normal" Would like a 17-35 2.8 to replace it with or the 17-55 2.8 but couldn't do ultra wides with it on my film body's(it's a dx lens). Or the 20-35 2.8 which is a ton cheaper than the 17-35 but used prices have skyrocketed since the D700 came out.
Mid range I have pretty well covered, 50 1.4 and 85 1.8
Tele lenght is kinda iffy, 135 2.8 ai-s, don't use much because of metering issues.
55-200vr, excellent cheap through around lens.
70-300, my most used wildlife lens. Completely happy with this accept it's still to short most of the time.
Add to long end either 300 f/4 and 1.4x, or 80-400vr. Both have pluses and minuses not really sure which way i want to go.
But even at 400mm, will that be close enough? As close as i could get sneaking up on water foul, of getting to new areas/angles. Probly not.
Plus I really haven't been shooting much lately, I think this would help bring more life back to my shooting than adding another lens to my line up. And cheaper to boot.
These are just some thoughts I have been having.
So for lenses I have enough to shoot with for sure even though I am lacking in some areas,
Lens line up is
28 2.8 ai-s
28 2.8d
50 1.4d
85 1.8d
135 2.8 ai-s
18-135 af-s
55-200
70-300
cheap no-name ai-s type fish
2x converter ai-s style
ton of other random stuff, flashes pods,filters,gels etc etc etc.
I think the being on the water would add another enjoyable aspect of it, maybe maybe not. Stepping off into deep holes that you don't see wearing waders around gators kinda sucks lol.