Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > General Information > Open Talk


Hard Drive Weight

This is a discussion on Hard Drive Weight within the Open Talk forums, part of the General Information category; This is PRICELESS: http://social.answers.microsoft.com/...d-bbd5cb1a7605 "Apologies if this is the incorrect area for this question. I've noticed that as I copy ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Forum Regular
 
jgrindal's Avatar
 
Posts: 500
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Justin
Camera: Canon 5D Mk II
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Hard Drive Weight - 08-18-2009, 04:34 AM


This is PRICELESS:

http://social.answers.microsoft.com/...d-bbd5cb1a7605

Quote:
"Apologies if this is the incorrect area for this question.

I've noticed that as I copy data/install programs on my Laptop, the weight of the Laptop increases. I have a bad back and am medically limited on the amount of weight I can carry so I need to be very carefull not to inflict injury upon myself.

I have also noticed my XBox feels heavier as well (the more games I save or purchase from arcade). I generally don't travel with my XBox so that is not an issue for me, but note the I am having the same results.

My ask, what is the weight/file ratio? So for example, how many GB's = 6oz? I dread the day I need a dolly to commute to work with my Laptop.

Thanks in advance!"
I seriously laughed for 5 minutes.

---------------------------
-JG
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Forum Master
 
Kalrog's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,044
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Leander, Texas
Real First Name: Nathan
Camera: Olympus E3
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 20
Likes Given LIKES Given: 13
08-18-2009, 07:34 AM


I think it is 1GB/oz...
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Forum Master
 
Some Idiot's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,488
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Real First Name: Rob
Camera: Canon 5DMKII, Canon 7D, Canon A620, KS 500
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 6

Likes Received LIKES Received: 15
Likes Given LIKES Given: 63
08-18-2009, 07:47 AM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalrog View Post
I think it is 1GB/oz...


Unless your using iMicrohards New "Automatic Gigaplexing Algorithmic Compression Reduction Module" (Beta Ver. 2.20.1.6)

You can now download for FREE, Just search google for A.G.A.C.R.M.

I have seen results as low as 3oz. per Terabite, Incredible!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Supa Dupa Poster
 
kenw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,674
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cypress, Texas
Real First Name: Ken
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 98
Likes Given LIKES Given: 83
08-18-2009, 08:06 AM


of course, software for the Mac weigh MUCH less......

---------------------------
5th Generation Texian.
(line 2) Watch this, Spot!
(line 3) Have I shown you my photos of my grandson? Wait, don't run! Hey!
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Forum Master
 
Some Idiot's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,488
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Real First Name: Rob
Camera: Canon 5DMKII, Canon 7D, Canon A620, KS 500
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 6

Likes Received LIKES Received: 15
Likes Given LIKES Given: 63
08-18-2009, 08:17 AM


Quote:
Originally Posted by kenw View Post
of course, software for the Mac weigh MUCH less......
Well sure it does, less features = less data = less weight, Duh ! :-)
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Forum Regular
 
Brains's Avatar
 
Posts: 506
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Brian
Camera: Canon 5d
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 4

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
08-18-2009, 09:02 AM


Everyone knows Microsoft's code is bloated, and thus weighs more per unit of work done. But graphics and video on the Mac is notoriously better, which means more bits, which means more weight. So you have to make a choice, really.

"If she weighs as much as a duck, then she's made of wood."
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Uber Poster
 
zebulus's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,087
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Coast City,
Real First Name: Barry Allen
Camera: Olympus/Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 7

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
08-18-2009, 09:05 AM


Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Wes Wes is offline
Premium Member
 
Wes's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,573
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mansfield, Texas
Real First Name: Wes
Camera: Nikon D3
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 2
08-18-2009, 09:42 AM


Roflmao!!

---------------------------
Nikon D3 | 28-70 f/2.8 | 70-200 f/2.8 VR | 200-400 f/4 VR | 50 f/1.4 | TC-14E II | SB-800 | SB-600

"A child is not likely to find a Father in God unless he finds something of God in his father." - Unknown
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Member
 
Atfulldraw's Avatar
 
Posts: 202
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Real First Name: Rod
Camera: Canon 50d
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
08-18-2009, 09:51 AM


they are out there.

no, seriously, they are way out there.
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
Forum Regular
 
jgrindal's Avatar
 
Posts: 500
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Justin
Camera: Canon 5D Mk II
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
08-18-2009, 10:53 AM


Well, if one would like to be technical:

1 J/°K ≈ 10^23 bits of information (Source)
1 GB ≈ 1.07*10^-14 J/°K = S
E = mc^2
ST = mc^2
Assuming room temperature encoding process at 295°K:
E = S*295°K ≈ mc^2
E/(c^2) ≈ 3.52*10^-29 g

1 ounce = 28.3495231 g
So,
1 GB ≈ 1.24*10^-30 oz
Now we want to find how many GB are in 6 oz:
x ≈ 6 oz / 1.24*10^-30 oz/GB
x ≈ 4.83*10^30 GB
So there're approximately 4.83*10^30 GB in 6 pure ounces of information.

Now, to put that in perspective, with a 100Mbps Fast Ethernet connection, this would take:
4.802012046222223e+27 DAYS
or 1.31561973869e+25 YEARS That's 1 septillion years

---------------------------
-JG
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
Forum Master
 
Kalrog's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,044
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Leander, Texas
Real First Name: Nathan
Camera: Olympus E3
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 20
Likes Given LIKES Given: 13
08-18-2009, 11:03 AM


dude... I'm in awe.

And you need a life. :)
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
Forum Master
 
studiocygnet's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,655
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Apache Shores, near Austin., Texas
Real First Name: Tom
Camera: Mamiya, Pentax, Ricoh, Zeiss Icon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 7
Likes Given LIKES Given: 2
08-18-2009, 11:18 AM


The comments to the question are great too. My favorite "Avoid .exe files as they are really heavy according to Christophé Toffy Brun in his 1908 memoirs..."

---------------------------
"The trail is the thing, not the end of the trail. Travel too fast and you miss all you are traveling for." ~Louis L'Amour
B & W = Beautiful and wondrous. | Square is rare! | http://www.studiocygnet.com/
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
Forum Regular
 
sldi's Avatar
 
Posts: 631
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Real First Name: John
Camera: Canon 5dMKII
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 2
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
08-18-2009, 05:37 PM


Now I understand why my camera feels so heavy after a long shoot. My E520 has 10 megapixels and my E500 is only 8mp. If I shoot the same amount of pics on each camera my 500 always weighs less than the 520.

Does anyone know if .jpgs weigh more than raw files since the raw files don't have processing done on them?
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
Member
 
jtillery's Avatar
 
Posts: 55
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Justin, Texas
Real First Name: Jerry
Camera: D90
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
08-18-2009, 06:20 PM


This is classic.
Reply With Quote
  (#15) Old
Forum Master
 
Kalrog's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,044
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Leander, Texas
Real First Name: Nathan
Camera: Olympus E3
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 20
Likes Given LIKES Given: 13
08-18-2009, 08:05 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by sldi View Post
Now I understand why my camera feels so heavy after a long shoot. My E520 has 10 megapixels and my E500 is only 8mp. If I shoot the same amount of pics on each camera my 500 always weighs less than the 520.

Does anyone know if .jpgs weigh more than raw files since the raw files don't have processing done on them?
RAW files always weigh more than jpegs... Because the jpeg compression algorithm is a lossy one. If you went TIFF or similar lossless, the weight would be the same.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
drive, hard, weight

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.