Quote:
Originally Posted by Flea77 Everyone has a different opinion about websites. Yes, theirs is a little sparse on "pop", but it does a fairly good job of providing information. It could always be worse, you know, something like a flash site that just switches between a bunch of photos and provides no information at all except a name and address :-)
Allan |
My page states that it is only a temporary page, which should be replaced by a real site very soon. I think that is better than having no website, in the meantime. And my janikphoto.com page lists my other full website at janikfoto.com, not just my name and number.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnastovall I fail to see what their website has to do with the information they provide which is current and the call for works.
Some of us judge a website by its content not its flash, just as one does a ' Little Black Dress.' |
I'm not saying they need a bunch of bells and whistles, but they are supposed to be a publication. I think the site's branding needs to be better carried over to their website. This page looks like someone took five minutes to post a bunch of info. I just think a professional publication needs to have a more professional website.