The answer to the question everyone is asking - How much wood can a woodchuck chuck?This is a discussion on The answer to the question everyone is asking - How much wood can a woodchuck chuck? within the Open Talk forums, part of the General Information category; •He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•If he could chuck ...
(#1)
| | Closed Account
Posts: 429 Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Dallas-Fort Worth, Real First Name: Digi Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 | The answer to the question everyone is asking - How much wood can a woodchuck chuck? -
12-07-2009, 10:53 AM
•He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•If he could chuck wood, the woodchuck would chuck as much as he could!
•A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•A woodchuck would chuck all the wood that the woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•If a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would and should chuck wood. But if woodchucks can't chuck wood, they shouldn't and wouldn't chuck wood. Though were I a woodchuck, and I chucked wood, I would chuck wood with the best woodchucks that chucked wood.
•If a woodchuck could chuck wood, then s/he'd chuck all the wood, s/he'd chuck and chuck and chuck and chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•It would chuck the amount of wood that she sells seashells on the seashore divided by how many pickles Peter Piper picks.
•One quarter of a sycamore if you give him a quarter for every quarter of the sycamore he cut.
•It might depend on how many female woodchucks were present. Or, it could depend on whether the woodchuck's mother-in-law was around or not. If she was, he'd be chucking all day. If not, he'd be watching the football game.
•Some maintain that woodchucks could not and would not chuck wood at all.
•It depends on how good his dentures are!
•A woodchuck, would chuck, as much wood, as a woodchuck, could chuck, If a woodchuck could chuck wood. But unfortunately, woodchucks do not chuck wood.
•About 5.72 fluid litres of wood
•About as many boards as the Mongol hoards would hoard if the Mongol hordes did hoard boards.
•Um....... 23????
•Tons. More than you can count. Honestly. No one can chuck more would than a woodchuck.
•If the woodchucks name was Maurice, then it could chuck all the wood that it wants to. However, if its name is Frank, no chucking would be for it.
•Due to the average size of a wood chuck and the general density of wood (not including cork) if a wood chuck could chuck wood it would probably get through about 6.573 pounds per day, assuming the wood chuck is functioning correctly.
•Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
•How Chuck Norris got involve: A woodchuck would only chuck as much would as Chuck Norris would allow it to, because the woodchuck shares Chuck's name. Therefore, Chuck must punish it and make it chuck as much wood as Chuck can. So, a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as Chuck could.
•None cuz a wood chuck cant chuck wood!
•Approximately 3.9675 pounds every 5.6843 seconds. So there.
•2.865 lbs every 11.3686 Seconds?
•About 15 pounds a minute. | | | | | Sponsored Links | Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
|
(#2)
| | Premium Member
Posts: 1,751 Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Mesquite, Texas Real First Name: Stephen Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: No iTrader Rating: 17 LIKES Received: 55 LIKES Given: 0 |
12-07-2009, 11:08 AM
Step away from the coffee cup... just step away and no one will get hurt.
---------------------------
I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on.
I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them.
- J. B. Books
| | | |
(#3)
| | Member
Posts: 174 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Harlingen, Texas Real First Name: Sem Camera: Canon 5D Mark II, 40D, 20D Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 | How much would a wood chuck, chuck... -
12-07-2009, 11:59 AM
The correct answer is: Flap Jacks...
" Quote:
Originally Posted by Digigeek •He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•If he could chuck wood, the woodchuck would chuck as much as he could!
•A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•A woodchuck would chuck all the wood that the woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•If a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would and should chuck wood. But if woodchucks can't chuck wood, they shouldn't and wouldn't chuck wood. Though were I a woodchuck, and I chucked wood, I would chuck wood with the best woodchucks that chucked wood.
•If a woodchuck could chuck wood, then s/he'd chuck all the wood, s/he'd chuck and chuck and chuck and chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•It would chuck the amount of wood that she sells seashells on the seashore divided by how many pickles Peter Piper picks.
•One quarter of a sycamore if you give him a quarter for every quarter of the sycamore he cut.
•It might depend on how many female woodchucks were present. Or, it could depend on whether the woodchuck's mother-in-law was around or not. If she was, he'd be chucking all day. If not, he'd be watching the football game.
•Some maintain that woodchucks could not and would not chuck wood at all.
•It depends on how good his dentures are!
•A woodchuck, would chuck, as much wood, as a woodchuck, could chuck, If a woodchuck could chuck wood. But unfortunately, woodchucks do not chuck wood.
•About 5.72 fluid litres of wood
•About as many boards as the Mongol hoards would hoard if the Mongol hordes did hoard boards.
•Um....... 23????
•Tons. More than you can count. Honestly. No one can chuck more would than a woodchuck.
•If the woodchucks name was Maurice, then it could chuck all the wood that it wants to. However, if its name is Frank, no chucking would be for it.
•Due to the average size of a wood chuck and the general density of wood (not including cork) if a wood chuck could chuck wood it would probably get through about 6.573 pounds per day, assuming the wood chuck is functioning correctly.
•Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
•How Chuck Norris got involve: A woodchuck would only chuck as much would as Chuck Norris would allow it to, because the woodchuck shares Chuck's name. Therefore, Chuck must punish it and make it chuck as much wood as Chuck can. So, a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as Chuck could.
•None cuz a wood chuck cant chuck wood!
•Approximately 3.9675 pounds every 5.6843 seconds. So there.
•2.865 lbs every 11.3686 Seconds?
•About 15 pounds a minute. | | | | |
(#4)
| | Closed Account
Posts: 429 Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Dallas-Fort Worth, Real First Name: Digi Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
12-07-2009, 12:20 PM
I don't think Jack flaps.
Having finally answered the woodchuck question, I'm calculating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. I think the answer is 2, but I need to run some confirmatory calculations. | | | |
(#5)
| | Member
Posts: 174 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Harlingen, Texas Real First Name: Sem Camera: Canon 5D Mark II, 40D, 20D Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
12-07-2009, 01:12 PM
Yes,
You know the questions on the radio:
And now for the bonus round:
1. How much wood would a wood chuck, chuck? Answer: Flap Jacks (correct).
2. What is the next word in this group: Crustration, Kumquat… Answer: Anti-disestablishment terrorism (correct)
3. How much gas would you spend ordering movies from Netflix? Answer: Ahh Ahh Zero (Correct!!!!!!). | | | |
(#6)
| | Queen Chat Killa
Posts: 1,590 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Cypress, Texas, Texas Real First Name: Kimberley Camera: 5dii Can Others Edit My Photos: No iTrader Rating: 1 LIKES Received: 5 LIKES Given: 12 |
12-07-2009, 02:47 PM
Is Tiger involved if so...9....no 10...opps wait maybe 11..who knows | | | |
(#7)
| | Light Moderator
Posts: 11,926 Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: West Plano, Texas Real First Name: Scott Camera: Nikon D3 & Hasselblad H2 Can Others Edit My Photos: No iTrader Rating: 16 LIKES Received: 44 LIKES Given: 10 |
12-07-2009, 02:48 PM
The question is actually "How many women other than his wife does Tiger Woods need to counteract his personal self image issues below the belt?"
The answer is currently at 9 (and growing) 
--------------------------- Scott Watters PoloDigital | Flickr | Pbase Nikon | Hasselblad | Phase One | Hensel | Apple | | | |
(#8)
| | Closed Account
Posts: 429 Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Dallas-Fort Worth, Real First Name: Digi Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
12-07-2009, 04:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by srwatters The question is actually "How many women other than his wife does Tiger Woods need to counteract his personal self image issues below the belt?"
The answer is currently at 9 (and growing)  | Or, if one has a wife that's as good looking as his (and perhaps one does - I do) then how many other women does one need?
Putting aside looks, that guy is simply a fool. | | | |
(#9)
| | Member
Posts: 67 Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Allen, Texas Real First Name: Marty Camera: Canon 5D Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
12-07-2009, 04:53 PM
I believe the correct answer is: Enough to fill a barn in the middle of Arkansas. | | | |
(#10)
| | Member
Posts: 108 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: San Antonio, Real First Name: Caleb Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 1 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
12-07-2009, 05:25 PM
Chuck Norris! | | | |
(#11)
| | Member
Posts: 95 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: San Antonio, Real First Name: Donna Camera: Nikon D60 SLR Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
12-07-2009, 05:35 PM
The answer is 42. That is the answer for everything | | | |
(#12)
| | Uber Poster
Posts: 3,058 Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Houston, Texas Real First Name: Kevin Camera: Yes Can Others Edit My Photos: No iTrader Rating: 2 LIKES Received: 64 LIKES Given: 10 |
12-07-2009, 08:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skele The answer is 42. That is the answer for everything | Donna,
How old are you ???..... 
---------------------------
Kevin
C&C always appreciated.
| | | |
(#13)
| | Member
Posts: 95 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: San Antonio, Real First Name: Donna Camera: Nikon D60 SLR Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
12-07-2009, 08:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ Smith Donna,
How old are you ???.....  | I was born in October 1967... | | | |
(#14)
| | Uber Poster
Posts: 3,316 Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Mansfield, Texas Real First Name: Jeff Camera: Nikon D300/D70 Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 4 LIKES Received: 48 LIKES Given: 28 |
12-07-2009, 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kronos2818 2. What is the next word in this group: Crustration, Kumquat… Answer: Anti-disestablishment terrorism (correct) | lol It's actually "Antidisestablishmentarianism".
---------------------------
"If you find a job you love, you'll never have to work a day in your life."
| | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Google Sponsors | Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
| |
Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc. |