Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > General Information > Open Talk


The answer to the question everyone is asking - How much wood can a woodchuck chuck?

This is a discussion on The answer to the question everyone is asking - How much wood can a woodchuck chuck? within the Open Talk forums, part of the General Information category; •He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood. •If he could chuck ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Closed Account
 
Digigeek's Avatar
 
Posts: 429
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth,
Real First Name: Digi
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
The answer to the question everyone is asking - How much wood can a woodchuck chuck? - 12-07-2009, 10:53 AM


•He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•If he could chuck wood, the woodchuck would chuck as much as he could!
•A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•A woodchuck would chuck all the wood that the woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•If a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would and should chuck wood. But if woodchucks can't chuck wood, they shouldn't and wouldn't chuck wood. Though were I a woodchuck, and I chucked wood, I would chuck wood with the best woodchucks that chucked wood.
•If a woodchuck could chuck wood, then s/he'd chuck all the wood, s/he'd chuck and chuck and chuck and chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•It would chuck the amount of wood that she sells seashells on the seashore divided by how many pickles Peter Piper picks.
•One quarter of a sycamore if you give him a quarter for every quarter of the sycamore he cut.
•It might depend on how many female woodchucks were present. Or, it could depend on whether the woodchuck's mother-in-law was around or not. If she was, he'd be chucking all day. If not, he'd be watching the football game.
•Some maintain that woodchucks could not and would not chuck wood at all.
•It depends on how good his dentures are!
•A woodchuck, would chuck, as much wood, as a woodchuck, could chuck, If a woodchuck could chuck wood. But unfortunately, woodchucks do not chuck wood.
•About 5.72 fluid litres of wood
•About as many boards as the Mongol hoards would hoard if the Mongol hordes did hoard boards.
•Um....... 23????
•Tons. More than you can count. Honestly. No one can chuck more would than a woodchuck.
•If the woodchucks name was Maurice, then it could chuck all the wood that it wants to. However, if its name is Frank, no chucking would be for it.
•Due to the average size of a wood chuck and the general density of wood (not including cork) if a wood chuck could chuck wood it would probably get through about 6.573 pounds per day, assuming the wood chuck is functioning correctly.
•Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
•How Chuck Norris got involve: A woodchuck would only chuck as much would as Chuck Norris would allow it to, because the woodchuck shares Chuck's name. Therefore, Chuck must punish it and make it chuck as much wood as Chuck can. So, a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as Chuck could.
•None cuz a wood chuck cant chuck wood!
•Approximately 3.9675 pounds every 5.6843 seconds. So there.
•2.865 lbs every 11.3686 Seconds?
•About 15 pounds a minute.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Premium Member
 
SCone's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,751
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mesquite, Texas
Real First Name: Stephen
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 17

Likes Received LIKES Received: 55
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-07-2009, 11:08 AM


Step away from the coffee cup... just step away and no one will get hurt.

---------------------------
I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on.
I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them.
- J. B. Books
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Member
 
kronos2818's Avatar
 
Posts: 174
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Harlingen, Texas
Real First Name: Sem
Camera: Canon 5D Mark II, 40D, 20D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via Yahoo to kronos2818
How much would a wood chuck, chuck... - 12-07-2009, 11:59 AM


The correct answer is: Flap Jacks...

"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digigeek View Post
•He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•If he could chuck wood, the woodchuck would chuck as much as he could!
•A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•A woodchuck would chuck all the wood that the woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•If a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would and should chuck wood. But if woodchucks can't chuck wood, they shouldn't and wouldn't chuck wood. Though were I a woodchuck, and I chucked wood, I would chuck wood with the best woodchucks that chucked wood.
•If a woodchuck could chuck wood, then s/he'd chuck all the wood, s/he'd chuck and chuck and chuck and chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
•It would chuck the amount of wood that she sells seashells on the seashore divided by how many pickles Peter Piper picks.
•One quarter of a sycamore if you give him a quarter for every quarter of the sycamore he cut.
•It might depend on how many female woodchucks were present. Or, it could depend on whether the woodchuck's mother-in-law was around or not. If she was, he'd be chucking all day. If not, he'd be watching the football game.
•Some maintain that woodchucks could not and would not chuck wood at all.
•It depends on how good his dentures are!
•A woodchuck, would chuck, as much wood, as a woodchuck, could chuck, If a woodchuck could chuck wood. But unfortunately, woodchucks do not chuck wood.
•About 5.72 fluid litres of wood
•About as many boards as the Mongol hoards would hoard if the Mongol hordes did hoard boards.
•Um....... 23????
•Tons. More than you can count. Honestly. No one can chuck more would than a woodchuck.
•If the woodchucks name was Maurice, then it could chuck all the wood that it wants to. However, if its name is Frank, no chucking would be for it.
•Due to the average size of a wood chuck and the general density of wood (not including cork) if a wood chuck could chuck wood it would probably get through about 6.573 pounds per day, assuming the wood chuck is functioning correctly.
•Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
•How Chuck Norris got involve: A woodchuck would only chuck as much would as Chuck Norris would allow it to, because the woodchuck shares Chuck's name. Therefore, Chuck must punish it and make it chuck as much wood as Chuck can. So, a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as Chuck could.
•None cuz a wood chuck cant chuck wood!
•Approximately 3.9675 pounds every 5.6843 seconds. So there.
•2.865 lbs every 11.3686 Seconds?
•About 15 pounds a minute.
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Closed Account
 
Digigeek's Avatar
 
Posts: 429
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth,
Real First Name: Digi
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-07-2009, 12:20 PM


I don't think Jack flaps.

Having finally answered the woodchuck question, I'm calculating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. I think the answer is 2, but I need to run some confirmatory calculations.
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Member
 
kronos2818's Avatar
 
Posts: 174
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Harlingen, Texas
Real First Name: Sem
Camera: Canon 5D Mark II, 40D, 20D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via Yahoo to kronos2818
12-07-2009, 01:12 PM


Yes,
You know the questions on the radio:

And now for the bonus round:

1. How much wood would a wood chuck, chuck? Answer: Flap Jacks (correct).
2. What is the next word in this group: Crustration, Kumquat… Answer: Anti-disestablishment terrorism (correct)
3. How much gas would you spend ordering movies from Netflix? Answer: Ahh Ahh Zero (Correct!!!!!!).
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Queen Chat Killa
 
kimberley's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,590
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cypress, Texas, Texas
Real First Name: Kimberley
Camera: 5dii
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 5
Likes Given LIKES Given: 12
12-07-2009, 02:47 PM


Is Tiger involved if so...9....no 10...opps wait maybe 11..who knows

---------------------------
"wag more, bark less"

www.photographybykimberley.com l www.senior-ography.com
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Light Moderator
 
srwatters's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,926
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Plano, Texas
Real First Name: Scott
Camera: Nikon D3 & Hasselblad H2
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 16

Likes Received LIKES Received: 44
Likes Given LIKES Given: 10
12-07-2009, 02:48 PM


The question is actually "How many women other than his wife does Tiger Woods need to counteract his personal self image issues below the belt?"
The answer is currently at 9 (and growing)

---------------------------
Scott Watters
PoloDigital | Flickr | Pbase
Nikon | Hasselblad | Phase One | Hensel | Apple
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Closed Account
 
Digigeek's Avatar
 
Posts: 429
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth,
Real First Name: Digi
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-07-2009, 04:43 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by srwatters View Post
The question is actually "How many women other than his wife does Tiger Woods need to counteract his personal self image issues below the belt?"
The answer is currently at 9 (and growing)
Or, if one has a wife that's as good looking as his (and perhaps one does - I do) then how many other women does one need?

Putting aside looks, that guy is simply a fool.
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Member
 
mcf0807's Avatar
 
Posts: 67
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Allen, Texas
Real First Name: Marty
Camera: Canon 5D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-07-2009, 04:53 PM


I believe the correct answer is: Enough to fill a barn in the middle of Arkansas.
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
Member
 
MrBeta's Avatar
 
Posts: 108
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Antonio,
Real First Name: Caleb
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-07-2009, 05:25 PM


Chuck Norris!
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
Member
 
Skele's Avatar
 
Posts: 95
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Antonio,
Real First Name: Donna
Camera: Nikon D60 SLR
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-07-2009, 05:35 PM


The answer is 42. That is the answer for everything
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
Uber Poster
 
KJ Smith's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,058
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Kevin
Camera: Yes
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 64
Likes Given LIKES Given: 10
12-07-2009, 08:11 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Skele View Post
The answer is 42. That is the answer for everything
Donna,

How old are you ???.....

---------------------------
Kevin
C&C always appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
Member
 
Skele's Avatar
 
Posts: 95
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Antonio,
Real First Name: Donna
Camera: Nikon D60 SLR
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-07-2009, 08:25 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ Smith View Post
Donna,

How old are you ???.....
I was born in October 1967...
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
Uber Poster
 
Jeff_Green's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,316
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mansfield, Texas
Real First Name: Jeff
Camera: Nikon D300/D70
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 4

Likes Received LIKES Received: 48
Likes Given LIKES Given: 28
12-07-2009, 08:37 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by kronos2818 View Post
2. What is the next word in this group: Crustration, Kumquat… Answer: Anti-disestablishment terrorism (correct)
lol It's actually "Antidisestablishmentarianism".

---------------------------
"If you find a job you love, you'll never have to work a day in your life."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
answer, chuck, question, wood, woodchuck

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.