Quote:
Originally Posted by Redneck No, I wasn't sarcastic at all. I don't think this picture is something you couldn't find at modelmayhem.com either.
If it is a "good" or a "bad" picture in regards to photographic quality doesn't really matter. |
Well, if that's the kind of thing to expect on MM, I'm glad that I haven't bothered to check it out. As a man, I couldn't help but thumb through a few pics at istudio.com, before I closed the window. However, the raunchy, slutty factor will only get you so far - such as a cheap, amateur photos porn site. Many of those photos look like point and shoot snapshots. The words model and studio are being used VERY loosely.
Again, I'm not saying the world doesn't have a niche market for trashy, low quality soft porn - it has a large market for that stuff. I'm just saying this is NOT real modeling and photography that will land jobs with fashion, editorial and commercial clients.