-Warning I’m going to go off. ....and ramble too. -
Quote:
|
if I could draw worth a flip
|
This statement is the key here.
Good god, I’ve heard this a bizillion times. Gee, all you have to do is.... and after all, your real good at it so you could knock it out in a couple of hours..... It’s not like it’s real work, it’s just cartoons. Arrrrgh! If ! ...If, if , if. If I could sing well, dance well, write well, sew well, cook well, play golf well. Just like these, how many people do you know who can illustrate “really well”? That’s what they’re asking for, “someone who can cartoon really well”. So, how many? 2? 1? None? Not that many huh? How many people do you know who do photography “really well”? I’d say they’re are maybe a couple of handfuls on this statewide forum. How ‘bout a “really good” musician, mechanic, doctor, plumber? All these people have something in common, they are rare. And because of that their work has a lot of value. Oh, and time has nothing to do with it. After all how much time does it take a photographer to just snap an image? (yes, a lifetime) A pastry chef can create a wedding cake a heck of a lot faster than me so why should he/she be able to charge a heck of a lot more? Value. Value due to talent. Do HR workers provide value to that company? Of course and they are paid for it. Will a really good illustrator add value to that company’s bottom line? You bet. So why shouldn’t they deserve to be properly compensated for it just like the HR workers? If the illustrator has “an artistic gift” one could argue they have a lifetime of hours in that job. A lawyer may bill 45 minutes to advise a company on a decision that may save them millions of dollars. How much value does that 45minutes have? How ‘bout the simplicity of some corporate logos/branding? “Oh, that’s so simple, I could have thought of that”. ...But you didn’t. Ideas have value. As you suggest, putting a pen in your hand won’t produce a really good cartoon. So there’s more than just pen and paper involved here. That “something more” has value. I bet those HR people couldn’t make your “really nice camera” sing like you can. You bring your degree of value to the table and only you decide how much that’s worth. If you’re really good you deserve to be compensated accordingly even if it comes easy to you and you enjoy it. ...even if you HAPPEN to be a student. And don’t get me started on exploiting students. If you haven’t had a chance to hone your skills yet you may have to agree to some lower paying gigs until your work measures up, but that’s not the case here. They want work that measures up. Well guess what, if the work measures up the value goes up. If you can run with the big dogs you should be treated like a big dog. You think Columbia University is going to say “Let’s don’t give the Pulitzer to this kid because they’re just a student”?
Quote:
|
However - take a 3rd year art student - who lives on financial aid - loves to go to SB and have a cup of java and study...but doesn’t because the $5 Frap isn’t in their budget. They can draw. They like coffee. Should they not do it because Mr. Established wouldn’t accept that arrangement?
|
No, they should not do it because they CAN draw, ...”really well” and this compensation falls well short of what their talent is worth. If they can’t draw, they shouldn’t respond to the post. If the company wants to go cheap then they need to change the post to reflect their lower expectations and leave the insulting “student” reference out of it. Some students do better work than seasoned pros. Compensation should be based on one's value not their age, sex, race, etc.
Sorry Donna, you struck a nerve.