Quote:
Originally Posted by KD5NRH Hydrogen, carbon, probably some sulfur and other smelly stuff.
One interesting thing as the water warms up will be that hydrates should revert to a gaseous state. I would assume that most of them do anyway at some point during the trip to warmer, lower pressure waters near the surface, but some may travel a long distance in solid form before releasing the gases, resulting in some false alarms if a high enough concentration lets go at once. |
True

C
nH
2n+n and stuff...
I've seen a few concerns about benzene exposure. I suppose that, knowing it's a carcinogen, it's not unreasonable to be concerned, but people get more exposure to benzene from fueling their vehicles over their lifetime than they should from the leak. Also- glycol dehydrator and amine plant vent stacks (of which there are 100's of thousands if not more) have, until recently, had no controls on their emissions. BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl-benzene, and Xylene... some of the alkenes) emissions have only been required to be controlled in the last 10 or so years. Even then it's dumped back to crude oil tanks (from whence it came) and sold. From there it goes to all of the usual places. Prior to controls being put in place on new units (old units are grandfathered... or they were the last time I had to care about EPA regulations)... the vapor was vented. . I just saw two little dehy's on my way out of Aransas NWR yesterday and their emissions were not controlled. That's the norm imho. Amine (and other solvent) treaters vent their CO2 (and BTEX, sulfur compounds, etc) to the air. At some rate (#/Hr) they are required to be incinerated by the EPA. I think the reg is called Title 5 but I don't deal with that anymore and I don't care to even think about it at this point

If the H2S concentration is high enough the "old" answer was to build sulfur plants and recover the liquid sulfur. Sulfur plants are nasty, dangerous, corroding pieces of crap. They don't make any money (used to but the market was fertilizer and either the market was flooded or the demand dropped. I'm not sure what happened). These days they inject it back into the formation (as a liquid) because you can't get or keep a permit to emit the tail gas and tail gas plants are expensive and not efficient enough to meet the requirements of the regulations even if the permit was attainable. Liquid H2S is weird stuff (aside from being kill you dead dangerous). An engineer friend of mine dubbed it "floam"

because it behaves so oddly when you start pumping it down hole. Injection pressure can be as low as 1,200 psig and and high as 2,800 psig. Considering that it's 90% H2s and higher and that deadly concentration is in the ppm range you don't want to be around if something leaks. Like most things in the industry, it's regulated, controlled, and generally safe. At least as safe as driving a car.
I drove by one of the largest amine plants I had ever been around in the 4 corners area 15 or so years ago. It treated coal bed methane. I can't remember the CO2 venting rate but it was very high. A BCF/day comes to mind but that might be high. Maybe not...
With all of the media driven hysteria I suppose that it's not unreasonable for people to be concerned about benzene and other "toxics" coming from the spill. But... there are so many other active sources that I can't get too worked up about it. Probably because my house isn't on the shore of one of the beaches that is being impacted (at a much lower level than was originally thought... but tell that to the people that live there). Look up- Non-Attainment Area. Port Arthur is a non-attainment area. I believe that Texas City is a non-attainment area. Corpus Christi may be an non-attainment area.
Go to Google Earth and zoom in on these coords.
29°50'12.09"N
93°57'48.11"W
It's a plant (non-petroleum) in Port Arthur owned, at the time I shot some photo's of it, by a company in New York if I remember right. I drove by it one morning at 2am-ish (hard to remember exact time). I shot a few images of it spewing what was obviously not steam and sent them to the EPA. I can't remember the name of the company but when I looked them up their violations list was huge. They do not care... I never heard anything from the EPA... and didn't expect to.
BTW- Every image that I've ever seen of "pollution" coming from power plants or refineries was of steam. It's not that they don't emit... it's that the emissions are not usually visible, especially during the day, and that the photographer / videographer didn't have a clue about what he was shooting. Plus steam plumes are more dramatic.
On the topic of hydrates- When we had to deal with them in the plant(s) we always tried to clear them by injecting methanol and raising the temperature. That helped but the best solution was to follow that up with reducing the pressure to 0. It's hard to make them vaporize without lowering the pressure.