Wayne- If that's supposed to be a shot of a duck on a june bug then I think your settings were off
Quote:
|
I would still find Adams' EXIF data to be a useful tool for comparing/contrasting/studying
|
As you noted- he did so much in post processing that I don't know if his "EXIF" would help much (I wonder if he kept notes? I think that I know someone that I could ask). It's kind a cool mind exercise though and for me it further supports the somewhat uselessness of EXIF. If I shoot an image and end up pushing it a stop or so in ACR and moving the black point up a little... maybe adding in some contrast.... slide the white balance a little toward warm or cool... etc then the viewer "thinks" that the EXIF is telling them how the image was shot and what it's really telling them is how the shot was screwed up
