Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > General Information > Open Talk


Great Telescope for $200... Any suggestions?

This is a discussion on Great Telescope for $200... Any suggestions? within the Open Talk forums, part of the General Information category; So my Wife has been wanting a really good telescope for years, and just never made it round to picking ...

Like Tree6Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
took an arrow to the knee
 
TheFantasticG's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,149
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Shady Vale, Southland
Real First Name: Garret
Camera: Canikon D7600
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 85
Likes Given LIKES Given: 37
Great Telescope for $200... Any suggestions? - 02-25-2011, 07:03 PM


So my Wife has been wanting a really good telescope for years, and just never made it round to picking one out because she has a genetic defect that makes her incapable of making decisions randomly. I've been looking through the different types of telescopes, reviews, and all that, but when it comes down to it, I'm just not sure which is the best bang for the buck. I don't mind spending alittle more if its worth it, but there again I have no way of knowing. I'd rather not go through the hassle of returning blah blah blah. Purchasing the right one in the first place would be much preferrable.

She wants to be able to see plants in our solar system in the least. Like I said, if I have to save up some more to do so, thats just what I'll have to do.

Any suggestions?

---------------------------
My Flickr
Canon 60D - 65mm MP-E + MR-14EX
Nikon D7000 - 1.4x TC APO EX + 150 2.8 HSM EX + Nikon R1
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Senior Member
 
ChrisTX's Avatar
 
Posts: 408
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Mansfield, Texas
Real First Name: Chris
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 57
Likes Given LIKES Given: 24
02-25-2011, 07:11 PM


My daughter has a Celestron Astromaster with an equatorial mount. It's a good scope for what we paid. The EQ mounts are far better than the azimuth, because you can smoothly control the movement of the scope on axis. I got a 2x Barlow piece to get in even closer. If you spend money on a telescope, research the tripods more than the glass itself. Seeing a far away planet is fun, but trying to get a jiggling telescope to keep up with it is not. You can spend a lot of money on them.

Of course, I immediately bought the adapters to plug my camera into it.
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Uber Poster
 
Hanky's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,976
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Real First Name: Henry
Camera: Nikon D300
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 20
Likes Given LIKES Given: 20
02-25-2011, 07:41 PM


What Chris said, I bought this huge reflecter thing on HSN and it wound up as garage sale fodder.
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Forum Master
 
markfh's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,064
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Mark
Camera: Canon 1DsMkII, 7D
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 6

Likes Received LIKES Received: 11
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
02-25-2011, 08:14 PM


Ok, if you want to spend $200.00 how about you just give me the cash and call it a day. Why? You can't get a good enough telescope to see squat for that little money.

If all you want to do is see the planets, and some of their moons, then buy a good pair of binoculars which $200.00 will do just fine.

Now, after you see the planets, and some of their moons then you can check out our moon.

After you get bored with all the above then you can sell what ever you buy in your next garage sale.

Now, if you really want to observe the skys then you're going to spend a little more money. Yes, you will want to have a good tripod but just like photography the glass is paramount.

If you're serious about wanting a telescope I suggest you spend $35.00 and join the Houston Astronomical Society. You can come to the once a month meetings we have at U of H and borrow one or more of several telescopes of different types. That way you can see if you're really interested and check out just how much it cost to get into this hobby.

It's like photography, if you don't invest in good enough equipment your results will be disappointing.

There are many more amazing things to see in the night sky and even some in the day sky and a good telescope allows you to really observe them. Astronomy can be addictive and a very expensive hobby so watch out...
iCe likes this.

---------------------------
"To be ignorant of one's ignorance is the malady of the ignorant." Amos Bronson Alcott
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
took an arrow to the knee
 
TheFantasticG's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,149
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Shady Vale, Southland
Real First Name: Garret
Camera: Canikon D7600
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 85
Likes Given LIKES Given: 37
02-25-2011, 09:18 PM


Yeah, thanks Mark, but not really what I was asking information on. I'll pass it on to her regardless though.

---------------------------
My Flickr
Canon 60D - 65mm MP-E + MR-14EX
Nikon D7000 - 1.4x TC APO EX + 150 2.8 HSM EX + Nikon R1
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Senior Member
 
Steve Balderrama's Avatar
 
Posts: 280
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston, TX, Texas
Real First Name: Steve
Camera: Canon 5DmkII, Bronica SQ
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 15
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
02-25-2011, 09:36 PM


I suggest going to some meetings and star parties of the Houston Astronomical Society ( Houston Astronomical Society ) and trying different things out and seeing what you "really" can see with a telescope. If you are expecting images like what you see on the side of boxes, you will be disappointed. If you take the time to train your eye, it can be a great hobby.

and I'll second that nearly any $200 dollar telescope is going to be bad. $200 on binoculars is much better.
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
took an arrow to the knee
 
TheFantasticG's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,149
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Shady Vale, Southland
Real First Name: Garret
Camera: Canikon D7600
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 85
Likes Given LIKES Given: 37
02-25-2011, 10:19 PM


Thanks, and again, I'll pass it on to my Wife as the telescope is for her, not me.

---------------------------
My Flickr
Canon 60D - 65mm MP-E + MR-14EX
Nikon D7000 - 1.4x TC APO EX + 150 2.8 HSM EX + Nikon R1
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Member
 
wwong's Avatar
 
Posts: 173
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sugar Land, Texas
Real First Name: Wilfred
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 6

Likes Received LIKES Received: 14
Likes Given LIKES Given: 5
02-25-2011, 11:13 PM


+1 Steve.

At 1000mm (35mm) at 100% corp, this is what Jupiter, the largest in the solar system, looks like



If you have a chance to visit Brazos Bend State Park on a Saturday 3pm-10pm, check out the George Observatory. There are people stargazing whom are very friendly and are willing to let you see their scopes and you can ask them questions.

-Wilfred
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Senior Member
 
ChrisTX's Avatar
 
Posts: 408
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Mansfield, Texas
Real First Name: Chris
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 57
Likes Given LIKES Given: 24
02-25-2011, 11:57 PM


With the Barlow, 1/4 of the moon will completely fill up the view piece. It would be nice to drop a grand on a nice computer controlled telescope, but I'm not into it that much, and my daughter wanted one for her birthday. The occasional peep at the moon or a planet is not something I'm prepared to sink that much money into. This one gets a tiny bit of CA on the edges if you are a glass snob, but it's not so much that people notice.

If you have money burning a hole, spend as much as you can. If not, these came from a 'less than $200' telescope at 900mm.



Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
Senior Member
 
Steve Balderrama's Avatar
 
Posts: 280
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston, TX, Texas
Real First Name: Steve
Camera: Canon 5DmkII, Bronica SQ
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 15
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
02-26-2011, 08:16 AM


I will say that there is one $200-ish telescope that has been around forever and actually works pretty well. Good Old Astroscan 2000.

Astroscan Plus Telescope - best selling beginner telescope | Edmund Scientific

Here is a pretty good little article: http://www.deepastronomy.com/what-yo...telescope.html

TxTowman likes this.

Last edited by Steve Balderrama; 02-26-2011 at 08:28 AM..
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
He's dead, Jim!
 
wclavey's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,635
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Far West Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Westley
Camera: Olympus E-30
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 45
Likes Given LIKES Given: 51
02-26-2011, 10:02 AM


Steve, that is an excellent recommendation and you beat me to it...

Also, try checking out Orion Telescopes in CA (Telescopes for Sale and Telescope Accessories at Telescopes.com) - - they have all their equipment categorized by skill level and price. I have bought several complete scopes from them, as well as the parts to build and modify other scopes, back when they sold more of that stuff.

There is also a great astronomy store on the NW side of San Antonio (Analytical Scientific, I think). They have a lot of stuff on the floor that you can touch and try and they had used equipment at one time - - I haven't been there in about 10 years...).

Avoid buying something directly from a retail nature or outdoor store unless you know that is exactly what you want and you have checked the prices elsewhere.

But the Astroscan (above) is a great instrument for the price and the friends I have with them still take them camping or on picnics (fitted with solar filters - - some filter modification required) because they are so handy - - even though they have equipment costing much more.
TxTowman likes this.

---------------------------
I welcome comments on any picture I post... Thanks.
Tripod - (n., archaic.) 1. Image stabilization
Wes Clavey, WB2SVF | My LUG Gallery Album
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
took an arrow to the knee
 
TheFantasticG's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,149
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Shady Vale, Southland
Real First Name: Garret
Camera: Canikon D7600
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 85
Likes Given LIKES Given: 37
02-26-2011, 07:22 PM


Steve, thanks. Thats exactly what I was looking for.

---------------------------
My Flickr
Canon 60D - 65mm MP-E + MR-14EX
Nikon D7000 - 1.4x TC APO EX + 150 2.8 HSM EX + Nikon R1
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
Senior Member
 
Steve Balderrama's Avatar
 
Posts: 280
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston, TX, Texas
Real First Name: Steve
Camera: Canon 5DmkII, Bronica SQ
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 15
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
02-26-2011, 07:40 PM


I also recommend this book, its really fun reading even if you arn't doing astronomy. :)

Its pretty good at helping beginners through the morass of decisions about telescopes and gear and general astronomy stuff in a humorous fashion.

Pick it up used for cheap, its a small book so it doesn't take long to read.

Amazon.com: Light Hearted Astronomer (9780913135013): Ken Fulton: Books



Last edited by Steve Balderrama; 02-26-2011 at 07:43 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
took an arrow to the knee
 
TheFantasticG's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,149
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Shady Vale, Southland
Real First Name: Garret
Camera: Canikon D7600
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 85
Likes Given LIKES Given: 37
02-26-2011, 07:44 PM


Awesome. Thanks again.

---------------------------
My Flickr
Canon 60D - 65mm MP-E + MR-14EX
Nikon D7000 - 1.4x TC APO EX + 150 2.8 HSM EX + Nikon R1
Reply With Quote
  (#15) Old
Forum Regular
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Posts: 786
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Stephenville, Texas
Real First Name: Joe
Camera: Sony Alpha
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 4
Likes Given LIKES Given: 7
02-27-2011, 03:46 AM


Once you know what you want, keep an eye on OpticsPlanet.com - Binoculars, Sunglasses, Night Vision Goggles, Riflescopes, Flashlights, Telescopes, Rangefinders, Microscopes - Hunting, Outdoor, Science, & Military Gear for specials.

Like cameras, aperture is king. For solar system objects, you can get away with a 3-4" refractor or a 5-6" reflector, but for deep space objects, bigger optics make for much better views.

Frankly, if I had an extra $200 for telescope stuff, I'd shop online for a pair of mirrors and build a Newtonian. (Or watch Surplus Shed for refractor lenses) What you can build for $200 is roughly what you could buy for $500+.

Oh, and if you're thinking about shucking out $200 for binoculars, you'll want to put most of that into a tripod and mount for them. Even some $40 Bushnell 10x50s on a stable mount will beat a $200 pair handheld.

Last edited by KD5NRH; 02-27-2011 at 03:49 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
$200, great, suggestions, telescope

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.