Quote:
Originally Posted by zebulus One of the guys I work with approached me with a question the other day. He said a client of his (hes a city engineer) is building a water tower, and they want to do a time lapse photography deal on it. They want to be able to watch a video of the building process, from start to finish.
He told me the budget is huge on this, and could be upwards of $30,000 to make this happen.
But time lapse photography dosent seem like the right choice for that, as its slow and is only going to show a few frames. I think high speed photography is what they want. Where the entire thing is captured, from start to finish, but sped up.
What do you think? |
Time-lapsed is what he wants.
I love time-lapsed photography. I've been fascinated by it ever since I watched George Pal's "The Time Machine" back in the early '70s. You want a rig that is set up where it won't be disturbed for the duration of the project, then take a photo every 5 to 15 minutes while workers are present.
It would be good to have more than one location set up, for alternate views and in case something unfortunate happens to one of the locations.