Expose to the right - RGBThis is a discussion on Expose to the right - RGB within the Photo Tips forums, part of the Photography Information category; On cameras that can display the RGB histogram, I will assume that you should use the RGB display to get ...
(#1)
| | Member
Posts: 73 Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Austin, Texas, Real First Name: John Camera: Canon 40D iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 | Expose to the right - RGB -
03-02-2006, 09:09 PM
On cameras that can display the RGB histogram, I will assume that you should use the RGB display to get the fist color channel as close to clipping as possible? Correct? Most of the expose to the right rules only use the luminance histo as the example....
Thanks | | | | | Sponsored Links | Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
|
(#2)
| | Supa Dupa Poster
Posts: 4,596 Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Plano, TX, Texas Real First Name: John Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 1 LIKES Received: 1 LIKES Given: 0 |
03-02-2006, 10:25 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by jgaddy On cameras that can display the RGB histogram, I will assume that you should use the RGB display to get the fist color channel as close to clipping as possible? Correct? Most of the expose to the right rules only use the luminance histo as the example....
Thanks | You are correct. You really want to keep from blowing any of the color channels but you do want them as far to the right as possible. A friend of mine with a 10D kept wondering why some of his portraits looked like the subject had plastic skin. He checked his luminance histo and wasn't blowing it off the right. Turns out he had blown one of the color channels and that didn't show up on the luminance histo. | | | |
(#3)
| | Member
Posts: 73 Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Austin, Texas, Real First Name: John Camera: Canon 40D iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 | Another question about that... -
03-02-2006, 10:58 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by engstrom You are correct. You really want to keep from blowing any of the color channels but you do want them as far to the right as possible. A friend of mine with a 10D kept wondering why some of his portraits looked like the subject had plastic skin. He checked his luminance histo and wasn't blowing it off the right. Turns out he had blown one of the color channels and that didn't show up on the luminance histo. |
Ok, so here is a followup question to this question. Now that we have established that we don;t want to blow any channels but get one or all of them as close tot he right as possible....Let's say we are shooting something (especially with Canon's) that has a lot of red in it it. The red channel is going to lead way out in front of the other channel. From the Luminance seems very low....What is the easiest way to get luminance levels up without getting are real artificial look. I am talking in post of course. I will say that getting the read channel. in this example, just from clipping as doing everything that can be done in camera....
Thanks | | | |
(#4)
| | Forum Master
Posts: 1,202 Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Sherman, Texas, Texas Real First Name: Wyatt Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
03-02-2006, 11:35 PM
I'm guessing, but something to try. Convert to LAB, up the levels, or maybe curves, on the L channel. I'd like to know what results you get if you try it.
Wyatt | | | |
(#5)
| | Supa Dupa Poster
Posts: 4,596 Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Plano, TX, Texas Real First Name: John Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 1 LIKES Received: 1 LIKES Given: 0 |
03-02-2006, 11:43 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by jgaddy Ok, so here is a followup question to this question. Now that we have established that we don;t want to blow any channels but get one or all of them as close tot he right as possible....Let's say we are shooting something (especially with Canon's) that has a lot of red in it it. The red channel is going to lead way out in front of the other channel. From the Luminance seems very low....What is the easiest way to get luminance levels up without getting are real artificial look. I am talking in post of course. I will say that getting the read channel. in this example, just from clipping as doing everything that can be done in camera....
Thanks | If the red channel is close to blowing then the picture, as seen by the camera, doesn't necessarily have high luminance levels. If you want to up the other levels in post then you could just work with the green and blue channels in post. | | | |
(#6)
| | Member
Posts: 73 Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Austin, Texas, Real First Name: John Camera: Canon 40D iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
03-03-2006, 12:32 AM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by engstrom If the red channel is close to blowing then the picture, as seen by the camera, doesn't necessarily have high luminance levels. If you want to up the other levels in post then you could just work with the green and blue channels in post. |
I have tried it before, that is why I am asking.....I usually do more harm to an image than good in post. That is why I am always trying to improve in-camera because if it is left up to me in post, the delete button is usually in the mix....
The is someone on this board that really know how to get good results by raising luminance in some many without killing color....I would love to hear it...
Thanks | | | |
(#7)
| | Premium Member
Posts: 1,259 Join Date: May 2005 Location: Houston, Texas Real First Name: TJ Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 7 LIKES Received: 1 LIKES Given: 3 |
03-03-2006, 07:32 AM
It's been my experience that when shooting a scene with a lot of reds (like a sunset, for example), exposing to the right ALWAYS leads to blowing the red channel. This applies to cameras (like mine) that do not display separate histograms for the R-G-B channels.
I've just begun some experimenting, but it looks like the red channel is safe if you expose approximately 1 full stop FROM the right (1 stop is about the first vertical line to the left of the right edge on the camera's histogram) in this type of situation (overpowering reds). | | | |
(#8)
| | Forum Master
Posts: 1,915 Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Azle, TX, Texas Real First Name: Steven Camera: Nikon D200 Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 3 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
03-03-2006, 07:53 AM
It's not just Canon, Nikon also shoots blazing reds. I think most digitals have a propensity to over blow the red channel.
What I've found is that getting a good present WB will help equalize the channels, thus exposing all the channels to the right is much easier.
Remember, certain situations require that the red channel lead the way no matter what(e.g. sunsets). Also, certain lighting just doesn't have a full spectra of all 3 channels (e.g. incandescent has very little blue). If you WB correctly, and keep the special case lighting in mind, it becomes a lot easier to fully saturate all the channels.
One more thing to keep in mind, there are 2 green pixels for each red and blue pixel. Your camera will artificially boost the red and blue by a factor to help equalize the channels. Since there is naturally more red light in the world than blue and the red channel is then multiplied by this boost factor, reds tend to reach blown status much quicker than the other channels. This boost factor is also the reason why the blue channel tends to have more noise than the other 2 channels. There is so little blue light, especially indoors, that the camera really boosts the blue channel, thus increase the noise level.
There has been an interesting article over at nikoncafe and dpreview about using colored filter to bias the sensor into recording fully saturated color channels without boosting the red and blue channel. Some of the sample images show an increase in dynamic range and a decrease in shadow noise.
---------------------------
Steve Almas
Nikon Geek "You can't deny my Evil4Blueness!" | | | |
(#9)
| | Premium Member
Posts: 1,259 Join Date: May 2005 Location: Houston, Texas Real First Name: TJ Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 7 LIKES Received: 1 LIKES Given: 3 |
03-03-2006, 08:26 AM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by evil4blue There has been an interesting article over at nikoncafe and dpreview about using colored filter to bias the sensor into recording fully saturated color channels without boosting the red and blue channel. Some of the sample images show an increase in dynamic range and a decrease in shadow noise. | Could you please post a link to that? Sounds very interesting. | | | |
(#10)
| | Forum Master
Posts: 1,915 Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Azle, TX, Texas Real First Name: Steven Camera: Nikon D200 Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 3 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
03-03-2006, 08:36 AM
---------------------------
Steve Almas
Nikon Geek "You can't deny my Evil4Blueness!" | | | |
(#11)
| | Premium Member
Posts: 1,259 Join Date: May 2005 Location: Houston, Texas Real First Name: TJ Camera: Canon Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 7 LIKES Received: 1 LIKES Given: 3 |
03-03-2006, 08:43 AM
Thanks! | | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Google Sponsors | Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
| |
Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc. |