Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Photography Information > Photo Tips


Expose to the right - RGB

This is a discussion on Expose to the right - RGB within the Photo Tips forums, part of the Photography Information category; On cameras that can display the RGB histogram, I will assume that you should use the RGB display to get ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Member
 
jgaddy's Avatar
 
Posts: 73
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas,
Real First Name: John
Camera: Canon 40D
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Expose to the right - RGB - 03-02-2006, 09:09 PM


On cameras that can display the RGB histogram, I will assume that you should use the RGB display to get the fist color channel as close to clipping as possible? Correct? Most of the expose to the right rules only use the luminance histo as the example....

Thanks
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Supa Dupa Poster
 
engstrom's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,596
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Plano, TX, Texas
Real First Name: John
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
03-02-2006, 10:25 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by jgaddy
On cameras that can display the RGB histogram, I will assume that you should use the RGB display to get the fist color channel as close to clipping as possible? Correct? Most of the expose to the right rules only use the luminance histo as the example....

Thanks
You are correct. You really want to keep from blowing any of the color channels but you do want them as far to the right as possible. A friend of mine with a 10D kept wondering why some of his portraits looked like the subject had plastic skin. He checked his luminance histo and wasn't blowing it off the right. Turns out he had blown one of the color channels and that didn't show up on the luminance histo.

---------------------------
John Engstrom
Plano, TX

http://www.pbase.com/engstrom

Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Member
 
jgaddy's Avatar
 
Posts: 73
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas,
Real First Name: John
Camera: Canon 40D
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Another question about that... - 03-02-2006, 10:58 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by engstrom
You are correct. You really want to keep from blowing any of the color channels but you do want them as far to the right as possible. A friend of mine with a 10D kept wondering why some of his portraits looked like the subject had plastic skin. He checked his luminance histo and wasn't blowing it off the right. Turns out he had blown one of the color channels and that didn't show up on the luminance histo.

Ok, so here is a followup question to this question. Now that we have established that we don;t want to blow any channels but get one or all of them as close tot he right as possible....Let's say we are shooting something (especially with Canon's) that has a lot of red in it it. The red channel is going to lead way out in front of the other channel. From the Luminance seems very low....What is the easiest way to get luminance levels up without getting are real artificial look. I am talking in post of course. I will say that getting the read channel. in this example, just from clipping as doing everything that can be done in camera....

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Forum Master
 
wyatt's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,202
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sherman, Texas, Texas
Real First Name: Wyatt
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
03-02-2006, 11:35 PM


I'm guessing, but something to try. Convert to LAB, up the levels, or maybe curves, on the L channel. I'd like to know what results you get if you try it.

Wyatt
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Supa Dupa Poster
 
engstrom's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,596
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Plano, TX, Texas
Real First Name: John
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
03-02-2006, 11:43 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by jgaddy
Ok, so here is a followup question to this question. Now that we have established that we don;t want to blow any channels but get one or all of them as close tot he right as possible....Let's say we are shooting something (especially with Canon's) that has a lot of red in it it. The red channel is going to lead way out in front of the other channel. From the Luminance seems very low....What is the easiest way to get luminance levels up without getting are real artificial look. I am talking in post of course. I will say that getting the read channel. in this example, just from clipping as doing everything that can be done in camera....

Thanks
If the red channel is close to blowing then the picture, as seen by the camera, doesn't necessarily have high luminance levels. If you want to up the other levels in post then you could just work with the green and blue channels in post.

---------------------------
John Engstrom
Plano, TX

http://www.pbase.com/engstrom

Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Member
 
jgaddy's Avatar
 
Posts: 73
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, Texas,
Real First Name: John
Camera: Canon 40D
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
03-03-2006, 12:32 AM


Quote:
Originally Posted by engstrom
If the red channel is close to blowing then the picture, as seen by the camera, doesn't necessarily have high luminance levels. If you want to up the other levels in post then you could just work with the green and blue channels in post.

I have tried it before, that is why I am asking.....I usually do more harm to an image than good in post. That is why I am always trying to improve in-camera because if it is left up to me in post, the delete button is usually in the mix....

The is someone on this board that really know how to get good results by raising luminance in some many without killing color....I would love to hear it...

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Premium Member
 
tjavery's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,259
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: TJ
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 7

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 3
03-03-2006, 07:32 AM


It's been my experience that when shooting a scene with a lot of reds (like a sunset, for example), exposing to the right ALWAYS leads to blowing the red channel. This applies to cameras (like mine) that do not display separate histograms for the R-G-B channels.

I've just begun some experimenting, but it looks like the red channel is safe if you expose approximately 1 full stop FROM the right (1 stop is about the first vertical line to the left of the right edge on the camera's histogram) in this type of situation (overpowering reds).

---------------------------
best regards,
TJ Avery
www.thomasjavery.com
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Forum Master
 
evil4blue's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,915
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Azle, TX, Texas
Real First Name: Steven
Camera: Nikon D200
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to evil4blue
03-03-2006, 07:53 AM


It's not just Canon, Nikon also shoots blazing reds. I think most digitals have a propensity to over blow the red channel.

What I've found is that getting a good present WB will help equalize the channels, thus exposing all the channels to the right is much easier.

Remember, certain situations require that the red channel lead the way no matter what(e.g. sunsets). Also, certain lighting just doesn't have a full spectra of all 3 channels (e.g. incandescent has very little blue). If you WB correctly, and keep the special case lighting in mind, it becomes a lot easier to fully saturate all the channels.

One more thing to keep in mind, there are 2 green pixels for each red and blue pixel. Your camera will artificially boost the red and blue by a factor to help equalize the channels. Since there is naturally more red light in the world than blue and the red channel is then multiplied by this boost factor, reds tend to reach blown status much quicker than the other channels. This boost factor is also the reason why the blue channel tends to have more noise than the other 2 channels. There is so little blue light, especially indoors, that the camera really boosts the blue channel, thus increase the noise level.

There has been an interesting article over at nikoncafe and dpreview about using colored filter to bias the sensor into recording fully saturated color channels without boosting the red and blue channel. Some of the sample images show an increase in dynamic range and a decrease in shadow noise.

---------------------------
Steve Almas
Nikon Geek

"You can't deny my Evil4Blueness!"
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Premium Member
 
tjavery's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,259
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: TJ
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 7

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 3
03-03-2006, 08:26 AM


Quote:
Originally Posted by evil4blue
There has been an interesting article over at nikoncafe and dpreview about using colored filter to bias the sensor into recording fully saturated color channels without boosting the red and blue channel. Some of the sample images show an increase in dynamic range and a decrease in shadow noise.
Could you please post a link to that? Sounds very interesting.

---------------------------
best regards,
TJ Avery
www.thomasjavery.com
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
Forum Master
 
evil4blue's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,915
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Azle, TX, Texas
Real First Name: Steven
Camera: Nikon D200
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 3

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to evil4blue
03-03-2006, 08:36 AM


Nikoncafe:
http://www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/sho...ighlight=cc40m

dpreview:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=17142860

---------------------------
Steve Almas
Nikon Geek

"You can't deny my Evil4Blueness!"
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
Premium Member
 
tjavery's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,259
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: TJ
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 7

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 3
03-03-2006, 08:43 AM


Thanks!

---------------------------
best regards,
TJ Avery
www.thomasjavery.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
expose, rgb

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.