Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Photography Information > Photo Tips


Good indoor shots w/o flash

This is a discussion on Good indoor shots w/o flash within the Photo Tips forums, part of the Photography Information category; So we went to the local Chinese New Year celebration thinking it would be a good place to get some ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
JKF JKF is offline
Junior Member
 
JKF's Avatar
 
Posts: 22
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston,
Real First Name: Julie
Camera: Nikon D80
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Question Good indoor shots w/o flash - 02-22-2007, 12:14 PM


So we went to the local Chinese New Year celebration thinking it would be a good place to get some good pictures, and I did, but not as many as I would have liked. I think more of my shots should have come out, but I do not understand what to do to my camera to make them come out, especially when flashes aren't allowed.

It was very brightly lit eventhough it was indoors, especially with the stage lights. I was shooting pics of dancers and tried several different camera settings. The sports setting did not do much to freeze the pictures, so I switched to manual mode and set my aperture to the lowest number and my shutter speed kicked up to stop the action. I also had my ISO set pretty high. These pics froze the action, but turned out very very dark.

I have a Nikon D80 with a 18-135mm lens. Is this simply a matter of getting a lens that has a wider aperture? I'm pretty new to photography so I haven't had a lot of opportunities to play around with settings yet - I only got my camera about a month ago.

Thanks for any tips you can give me!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Camouflaged Moderator
 
Daniel Bates's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,351
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Daegu, Korea
Real First Name: Daniel
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 9

Likes Received LIKES Received: 31
Likes Given LIKES Given: 35
02-22-2007, 12:17 PM


The 18-135 isn't a very fast lens, no. So if you want to get really good low, available light images, you'll need faster glass and high ISO values. When I shoot night sports, I shoot at f/2.8 and ISO 3200 and still have trouble freezing the action sometimes.

---------------------------
Forum Rules Here | How To: Report rule violations
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Uber Poster
 
Paulo's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,028
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Paulo
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 26

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 19
02-22-2007, 12:38 PM


Hi Julie. Post a few of the images you took (especially the ones you were disappointed with) along with the camera setting. It makes it easier to offer options.

From advice I've gotten from this forum and basic 'trial & error', I've learned that since photography is "all about light" aperture and shutter speed go hand in hand. Remember that whether you're manually setting your aperture OR shutter speed, you can only adjust one or the other to a certain extent based on the capabilities of your lens. The ISO speed needs to be fast enough to allow the sensor to collect data with the aperture and shutter speed you chose. I'm slowly experimenting with manual myself so I'm sure others will correct me if I'm giving your wrong data.
I shoot Aperture Priority most of the time on my gear. For low light situation, I will set my aperture to the widest my lens is capable of and see what the camera shows for my shutter speed after I meter. If the shutter speed seems to slow for me to hand hold the shot without blurring, I'll keep bumping up my ISO setting until I get to that minimum shutter speed needed. If I like the capture but feel it needs a little lightening or darkening, I use the Exposure Compensation button to + or - to my taste.

---------------------------
P a u l o
w e b s i t e
b l o g
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Supa Dupa Poster
 
kenw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,455
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cypress, Texas
Real First Name: Ken
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 65
Likes Given LIKES Given: 52
02-22-2007, 01:01 PM


Instead of Av (aperture priority) I use Tv (shutter priority) along with a fast lens and higher ISO. This will ensure stopping the action since I can select the shutter directly, and with a suitable ISO, the camera will select the Av needed. But as mentioned, it can only select Av values that are available, hence the need for faster lenses. For indoor + no flash shots I use a 50/1.8 or a 20/1.8.

I prefer this for moving subjects as freezing the movement (ala Tv) is more important that DoF. (usually....) And most fast lenses are sharper at less-than-max Av anyway. If If the camera NEEDS f1.8, it will take it, if not why not get the improvement of f3.5?

When using Av for this, you have to keep watching to make sure the shutter is fast enough. With Tv, you KNOW it will be. It's much less futzing in the heat of the action.

For bands and such I usually stay 1/125 and faster, ISO 400-800 (and up) and let the Av fall where it may. Dancers might need 1/180s shutters depending on the speed of movement.

---------------------------
5th Generation Texian.
(line 2) Watch this, Spot!
(line 3) Have I shown you my photos of my grandson? Wait, don't run! Hey!

Last edited by kenw; 02-22-2007 at 01:06 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Uber Poster
 
Paulo's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,028
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Paulo
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 26

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 19
02-22-2007, 01:45 PM


That makes a lot of sense, Ken. Thanks for sharing. The subjects I generally photograph are usually not fast moving. So for me, I prefer to control the DOF but I can see where Shutter Priority makes more sense in these situation.

---------------------------
P a u l o
w e b s i t e
b l o g
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Supa Dupa Poster
 
kenw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,455
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cypress, Texas
Real First Name: Ken
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 65
Likes Given LIKES Given: 52
02-22-2007, 02:06 PM


exactly, as always: "it depends"....if freezing the action is important, Tv; if DoF, then Av.

---------------------------
5th Generation Texian.
(line 2) Watch this, Spot!
(line 3) Have I shown you my photos of my grandson? Wait, don't run! Hey!

Last edited by kenw; 02-22-2007 at 02:09 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Member
 
Reuel's Avatar
 
Posts: 59
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin,
Real First Name: Reuel
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via Yahoo to Reuel
02-22-2007, 05:50 PM


Julie,

As you've figured out, the "sports" setting on the D80 is not for indoor action. It's for outdoor sports. It forces the camera to use the sunlight white balance setting and the continuous focusing setting and then prefers a high shutter speed over a small aperture.

When I shoot ballet in the theater, I use a 50mm f/1.8 lens and either S or M mode so I can control the shutter speed directly to make sure it's at least 1/125.

It's going to be very difficult to get good manual exposures indoors without some reliance on the meter. Your eyes fool you into thinking the light is bright because they've adjusted to the dark room. The meter still works in M mode, it just doesn't control the exposure. Meter something on stage that's mid-tone (mid-gray, or caucasian skin) and work from there.

---------------------------
Reuel
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Senior Member
 
xjben's Avatar
 
Posts: 371
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Round Rock,
Real First Name: Ben
Camera: 40D
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
02-22-2007, 06:27 PM


Go buy the fastest lens you can find...either a 2.8 short zoom or even better, I think Nikon has a 50mm 1.8 like Canon does. You can shoot in much lower light with those lenses than a standard lens...especially with higher ISO. Just if you shoot high ISO be sure to expose your pics well to avoid too much noise, especially on a Nikon from what I hear.

---------------------------
Ben
Canon 40D| 70-200 2.8 IS | 50mm 1.8 | 100mm Macro | 580EX II | 24-105 4.0 IS | Canon 1.4x Extender
www.KidSportsPictures.com
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Junior Member
 
mickmcco's Avatar
 
Posts: 47
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fairview,
Real First Name: Mick
Camera: Nikon D3
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
02-24-2007, 06:40 PM


Nikon has both a 50 f/1.8 and a 50 f/1.4 and it appears the 1.8 is sharper wide open, at least according to a recent test I've seen.

Even better news is that the 1.8, new, is just over $100 ( I just ordered one to use indoors with available light taking pics of my new granddaughter).

---------------------------
Mick

"You can observe a lot just by watching." -- Yogi Berra
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
JKF JKF is offline
Junior Member
 
JKF's Avatar
 
Posts: 22
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston,
Real First Name: Julie
Camera: Nikon D80
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Thumbs up 02-24-2007, 08:17 PM


Thanks for all the replies everyone - you pretty much summoned up what I was thinking. Good to know I guessed right!

Upon further review of my pics, I had lots of pics in the 1/100 sec range and in the 1/800 sec range, but not many in between. I wish I had taken a little more time to think thru things - that's hard to do in the heat of the moment when you know the shots will be gone in a few minutes!!

I appreciate all your input.

PS - Mick, if you can, keep us updated on how you like your lens when you get it!
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
AndrewCCM's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,327
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas
Real First Name: Andrew
Camera: 1D3, 7D, 5D2, LX3
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 8

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
02-24-2007, 09:05 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by JKF
Thanks for all the replies everyone - you pretty much summoned up what I was thinking. Good to know I guessed right!

Upon further review of my pics, I had lots of pics in the 1/100 sec range and in the 1/800 sec range, but not many in between. I wish I had taken a little more time to think thru things - that's hard to do in the heat of the moment when you know the shots will be gone in a few minutes!!

I appreciate all your input.

PS - Mick, if you can, keep us updated on how you like your lens when you get it!
When shooting in available light without a flash, be sure you look at your meter... You mentioned setting aperture as wide as possible and setting shutter to a semi quick shutter, and then ISO boosted. Was your meter reading properly exposed? If not, then your option is basically as mentioned above.. faster glass or lower your shutter speed.

---------------------------
Andrew
Website: Crystal Clear Media
Blog: CCM BLOG
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
Forum Master
 
LadyShutterBug's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,403
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Friendswood, Texas
Real First Name: Kasey
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 4

Likes Received LIKES Received: 21
Likes Given LIKES Given: 2
02-24-2007, 10:17 PM


i shoot a lot of weddings in lower light situations... i've got the nikon f/1.4 50mm and the sigma f/1.4 30mm... they are both great for getting what i want with ambient light.

if there is a good amount of light indoors, i can generally get away with not bumping my ISO (or only bumping it a little bit). just be sure to set your white balance according to the main source of light being used... or all of your pictures will come out yellow/blue/pink/not true to the colors you saw with your eyes.

i don't generally shoot in aperture mode... i prefer to shoot in shutter priority (Tv is what it's called on a Canon, on a Nikon it's just "S") if i am going to let the camera do the thinking for me. sometimes, even in lower light situations, you don't need to stop down all the way to 1.4 to get a good image.
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
Forum Regular
 
KeithAlanK's Avatar
 
Posts: 551
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Real First Name: Keith
Camera: Sony A300
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
02-25-2007, 05:57 AM


I shoot lots of club gigs with my band, and even though the lights may look bright, they usually aren't.
Our eyes get used to the dark, and because the stage is brighter than our surroundings it seems much brighter than it really is.

Freezing the action with a fast shutter usually doesn't work too well, even at my fastest usable settings of F2 @iso400. Theoretically, completely freezing the action is a great idea, it just doesn't work too well in the real world.
Especially if you don't own a Canon with clean high-iso results, and MY camera is downright ugly at iso800.

I generally set the shutter at 1/30.
It's tricky to go that slow handheld, but I have lots of practice. A tripod or monopod helps a lot, and allows me to go to 1/20 or even slower.

Mainly I want to say that a longer shutter like I use allows some motion-blur of the performers, and this often looks better to me than a complete freeze.
It imparts a sense of dynamics and energy that wouldn't be there otherwise.
I feel that it looks more 'real'.

Waiting to press the shutter until there's a slight pause in the action takes practice, but works well, too.

---------------------------
PhotoBlog: Views Of Texas
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
Member
 
arunap's Avatar
 
Posts: 108
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Houston,
Real First Name: Arun
Camera: 300d
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via MSN to arunap Send a message via Yahoo to arunap
02-26-2007, 01:44 AM


if nikon has a 1.5 then go for it. It is sure to get you the speed and more light thus avoiding the higher ISO settings.

---------------------------
Arun A.P - Canon 300d + 18-55 + 70-300
Reply With Quote
  (#15) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
AndrewCCM's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,327
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas
Real First Name: Andrew
Camera: 1D3, 7D, 5D2, LX3
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 8

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
02-26-2007, 01:57 AM


One thing to keep in mind with these super fast primes. DOF... Although you can get some great low-light performance, there are many times where I'd choose a slightly noisier image (boost ISO) and a smaller aperture just to be sure I am not too shallow. When using my F1.4 50mm on my 5D, I try and shoot between F2.2 and F4 if at all possible (depending on my subject matter).

---------------------------
Andrew
Website: Crystal Clear Media
Blog: CCM BLOG
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
flash, good, indoor, shots, w or o

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.