| Forum Master
Posts: 1,289 Join Date: May 2006 Location: Missouri City, Real First Name: Duffy Camera: Canon 20D Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes iTrader Rating: 0 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
01-02-2008, 08:40 PM
a bad histogram would look like either:
_________l or
l_________ or
l_________l or
__________
Anything with some information in the middle might be fine, depending on the subject.
BTW, I'm not even sure if the last histogram is possible. And the third one might actually be the desired effect, for an extreme high contrast shot. So, let's say the first two are really bad.... Doh!
Really, all the histogram does is show the distribution of brightness accross the available levels. The histogram for a white fox in a snow field should look alot different than the histogram of a fireworks display. Having said that, you typically don't want spikes at either end of the histogram. If the you can fit the entire frame within the middle of the histogram, that is usually considered better practice.
And if that is possible, it is generally preferable to push the histogram info as far to the right while still keeping the right end at the bottom. Digital cameras record more data in highlights than in shadows. Thus if you can push the exposure towards overexposure, without blowing the highlights, you will have more information captured, and more room to work in post processing.
Hope this helps some.
Duffy
Last edited by Duffy Pratt; 01-02-2008 at 08:50 PM..
|
| | |