| Senior Member
Posts: 269 Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Allen, Real First Name: Brian Camera: D200 Can Others Edit My Photos: No iTrader Rating: 2 LIKES Received: 0 LIKES Given: 0 |
12-24-2006, 06:27 PM
Well, at the risk of being contrary on Christmas eve, just a couple more points.
The City is responsible for water service only to the meter. Anything south of the meter, is premise plumbing, and is the property of (and responsibility of) the property owner. City crews will not work on plumbing beyond the meter, and that includes disconnecting it. It was (and is) the responsibility of the property owner to disconnect the premise plumbing prior to demolition. If you think about this, you'll realize it's so. Buildings and houses are hooked up using all sorts of plumbing systems and schemes. Why would the City assume responsibility and liability for modifying property it doesn't own, especially since it has no way of knowing what else is attached to the plumbing on the property side? They won't work on the plumbing at your house, and they won't do it for commercial property either.
I don't know the full details of what happened, but I can tell you this with authority: If the contractor did not disconnect the premise plumbing, and if the act of demolishing that premise plumbing caused the water line break, then the Contractor will be held liable for the damages. I say this as a person with 20 years experience managing and digging in municipal rights-of-way.
If I were going to guess, the City will leave the repair partially completed until the demolition is complete. It would just add to the confusion on site, and they may need to move the meter for whatever is going to be constructed there later. Likewise, I imagine they expect the contractor to backfill the hole.
I don't say all this to make you feel wrong. Rather, I hope it will help you to realize that you have seen only a small part of the story, and that the parts you didn't see put the pieces of the puzzle together in a way that makes things different. Those City guys you saw - their job is to fix broken pipes. Many of them are very junior level employees, often with very limited education and political abilities. They may or may not be bright bulbs, but they do work a difficult job full of risks and problems you are not aware of. They don't deserve to be called stooges. Most of them are just trying to feed their families, even though it often means working on days like today, wading in water filled with feces, used tampons, used toilet paper, and anything else people flush. They earn their money brother, believe me.
Hey - peace on earth and goodwill towards men, right?
I recall when I worked as a ROW manager for a local City. The water department hired a new kid who was a real go-getter. He was always first to volunteer to go down in the tough holes, the big sewer breaks, and he'd really put his back into it. Model employee in every way.
One day, one of the Asst. Directors called him into his office, and presented him with a raise, and a congratulations for a job well done. During the course of the conversation that followed, the Director mentioned that he was very impressed with the young man's willingness to brave the raw sewage in order to get the job done, since most guys hated to do it. He averred that most people just didn't like poo.
The young man looked at him, eyes growing wide, blinked twice, and said: "You mean that's sh*t down there?"
He quit the next day.
Last edited by Tapper; 12-24-2006 at 06:31 PM..
|
| | |