Quote:
Originally Posted by hotshot38 |
According to that article, the negatives for LR are subjective in my opinion. Although I have never tried Aperture since I use a PC.
Speed – Consistently much slower than Aperture in all areas. Displaying of images and editing.
This will supposedly change with the release of LR3. Even with my Intel Quad Core, 8GB of RAM, and fast hard drives, LR can be slow at times. But my one huge catalog containing 63,000+ RAW files and processing 100-300+ photos at one time can contribute to the slow speeds.
layout has always seemed a little clunky. Collapse some of the side toolbars and there is this annoying on-hover expansion – Coming from Aperture I really think that Adobe need to have a serious chat with the people in the UI department. The side panels which, once hidden, pop out at you on mouseover are terribly annoying. The other thing which I don’t like is the seperate areas you have to go to for viewing and editing, in Aperture once you’re looking at the photo you can view, edit, export, send to lightboxes and perform a whole host of actions on it.
This is funny. LR was specifically made with the photographer in mind. It increases workflow productivity ad reduces time post processing. Switching from Bridge/ACR, I thought LR did an incredible job with the layout. Keyboard shortcuts will make your life even easier.
Export options, books watermarking – The export options are not as strong as Aperture. There is no support for my book creation, my favourite Aperture export option.
Exporting options depend on what you're looking to do. I really love the export option of LR...again...just my opinion. The book creation thingy just seems gimmicky. I really don't see this counting as a negative for LR.
LOL, this link was posted at the bottom of that article.
http://stuartforsyth.com/2009/09/22/...d-of-aperture/