Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Photography Information > Post Processing Central


Lightroom vs. Aperture

This is a discussion on Lightroom vs. Aperture within the Post Processing Central forums, part of the Photography Information category; for warning: typed on iPhone, spelling and gramar may be off a bit from missed corrections on my part! Just ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Junior Member
 
Brandon Burkhardt's Avatar
 
Posts: 10
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Real First Name: Brandon
Camera: Canon 7D
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Lightroom vs. Aperture - 11-02-2009, 12:15 PM


for warning: typed on iPhone, spelling and gramar may be off a bit from missed corrections on my part!

Just want some opinions on folks pros and cons of each and why you prefer to use your choice. I have used LR for months now. I love how it manages files (And works better with apples time machien then Apples own photo app) but the interface is combersome and has extras I don't see my self ever useing. I.e. Web export and the like. I also prefer Dng for size and acesibilitiy with othe ps/lr users. However, aperture has a much cleaner and intuative inerface and when you use referaced files you have that greater flexibility even though it's one extra step. Plus i use iPhoto and iWeb for many quick sharing situations and aperture integrates beautifully!!!

I can't make a desicion!!! Please help!!! Thoughts??

Brandon B.
Www.brandonburkhardt.com
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Senior Member
 
peeker's Avatar
 
Posts: 310
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Plano, Texas, Texas
Real First Name: Scott
Camera: 5d Mark II, Canon 7D, Canon 50D, 20D backup
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 7
Likes Given LIKES Given: 5
11-02-2009, 01:16 PM


This is just like the Canon vs. Nikon debate. It ought to be interesting...

I for one am an Aperture user and find myself doing 90% of my post processing in it. After trialing Nik Software's complete collection, I am going to buy it in the next few days to take my post processing to almost 100% in Aperture.

---------------------------
Scott
EF 70-200 F/2.8 L IS, EF 24-105 F/4.0 L IS, EF 100mm f/2.8 macro, EF 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, EF 50 f/1.4
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Junior Member
 
Brandon Burkhardt's Avatar
 
Posts: 10
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Real First Name: Brandon
Camera: Canon 7D
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
11-02-2009, 02:13 PM


I know it! I'm a canon man becuase, well my first camera was a canon. And once you have the gear... both brands (and many others) can take stunning photos in the right hands.

But on to the subject matter. Please keep it coming whith pros and cons and why your useing which program!
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Forum Regular
 
hotshot38's Avatar
 
Posts: 593
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Real First Name: Sean
Camera: Canon 40D*grip
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 7
Likes Given LIKES Given: 1
11-02-2009, 02:37 PM


http://stuartforsyth.com/2009/01/12/...room-shootout/
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Premium Member
 
rwwright's Avatar
 
Posts: 309
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fairview, Texas
Real First Name: Ronnie
Camera: d300
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
11-03-2009, 01:27 PM


interesting differences already. i use lr for 90% of my processing. now using it for all of my web builds. love the interface. love the cateloging. have used several (purchased and used for year or more) other cataloging software. no comparision. rarely need to use cs3 for editing anymore.

never used a mac or apple software, probably never will. doesnt mean it is not good, just dont want to change to macs after so long on pc.

---------------------------
Ronnie Wright
nikon 300
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
The Nice Moderator
 
Sonny's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,353
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NW Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Sonny
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 9

Likes Received LIKES Received: 406
Likes Given LIKES Given: 104
11-03-2009, 02:17 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by hotshot38 View Post
According to that article, the negatives for LR are subjective in my opinion. Although I have never tried Aperture since I use a PC.


Speed – Consistently much slower than Aperture in all areas. Displaying of images and editing.
This will supposedly change with the release of LR3. Even with my Intel Quad Core, 8GB of RAM, and fast hard drives, LR can be slow at times. But my one huge catalog containing 63,000+ RAW files and processing 100-300+ photos at one time can contribute to the slow speeds.


layout has always seemed a little clunky. Collapse some of the side toolbars and there is this annoying on-hover expansion – Coming from Aperture I really think that Adobe need to have a serious chat with the people in the UI department. The side panels which, once hidden, pop out at you on mouseover are terribly annoying. The other thing which I don’t like is the seperate areas you have to go to for viewing and editing, in Aperture once you’re looking at the photo you can view, edit, export, send to lightboxes and perform a whole host of actions on it.
This is funny. LR was specifically made with the photographer in mind. It increases workflow productivity ad reduces time post processing. Switching from Bridge/ACR, I thought LR did an incredible job with the layout. Keyboard shortcuts will make your life even easier.


Export options, books watermarking – The export options are not as strong as Aperture. There is no support for my book creation, my favourite Aperture export option.
Exporting options depend on what you're looking to do. I really love the export option of LR...again...just my opinion. The book creation thingy just seems gimmicky. I really don't see this counting as a negative for LR.



LOL, this link was posted at the bottom of that article.
http://stuartforsyth.com/2009/09/22/...d-of-aperture/

---------------------------
Support Pixtus by Purchasing Your Gear From: B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama
Check out the NEW Pixtus Photography Cheat Sheet!
Our Forum Rules
| Report posts that break the Site Rules | Lightroom Learning Center

Last edited by Sonny; 11-03-2009 at 02:19 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Forum Regular
 
dmora's Avatar
 
Posts: 763
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, TX, Texas
Real First Name: Daniel
Camera: Nikon D700, F5, F2, FM2
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 3
Likes Given LIKES Given: 3
11-03-2009, 02:35 PM


I like them both. I think Aperture is a bit more rapid than LR in rendering images on the fly.
Aperture has better export options... the custom book making alone is insane. So wonderful not having to go thru a third party to make a book. I love it.

Its been a while since i've used Aperture unfortunately. It does need some tweaks still... but so does LIghtRoom. Currently i use Lightroom out the wazoo.

---------------------------
-Daniel
www.dmora.com
My Flickr Page
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
aperture, lightroom

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.