Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Photography Information > Post Processing Central


SmugMug vs Adorama 72DPI vs 300DPI.

This is a discussion on SmugMug vs Adorama 72DPI vs 300DPI. within the Post Processing Central forums, part of the Photography Information category; I've been using Adorama for my prints, mainly the large one. I finally decided to use Smug Mug, which is ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Forum Regular
 
Silverstangs's Avatar
 
Posts: 910
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sacramento,
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to Silverstangs
SmugMug vs Adorama 72DPI vs 300DPI. - 12-05-2007, 06:35 PM


I've been using Adorama for my prints, mainly the large one. I finally decided to use Smug Mug, which is not too difficult. I was working on the pricing, and noticed that they will only allow certain sizes to be printed, mainly the smaller stuff.

With Adorama, I have the DPI set to 300, which allows me to still print up to 16x24 inch. On SmugMug, it's limiting me to 5x7 as the largest image. For those of you using SmugMug, are you using the default 72 DPI and uploading the images like that?

---------------------------
Flicker - Silverstangs
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Uber Poster
 
Snarfy's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,674
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Real First Name: Chris
Camera: Nikon & FujiFilm
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 5

Likes Received LIKES Received: 98
Likes Given LIKES Given: 221
12-05-2007, 09:09 PM


If you are getting prints made at 72dpi, you might as well just run down to Kinko's.

---------------------------
...Was that the primary buffer panel?
500px | Twitter
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Forum Regular
 
Silverstangs's Avatar
 
Posts: 910
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sacramento,
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to Silverstangs
12-05-2007, 09:34 PM


That's exactly the thing, I want min of 300, but it seems like the only way I can get a 16x24 print, I have to use 72dpi. I must be missing something, or doing something wrong in the conversion.

---------------------------
Flicker - Silverstangs
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Forum Regular
 
Silverstangs's Avatar
 
Posts: 910
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sacramento,
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to Silverstangs
12-05-2007, 10:29 PM


AAARrRRRGGG

I gotta reprocess about 500 images.. dang it.. the badness was turned on in CS2 somehow.


---------------------------
Flicker - Silverstangs
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Senior Member
 
FerrisPhoto's Avatar
 
Posts: 420
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Omaha,
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-06-2007, 10:12 PM


There's really not a huge benefit to uprezing a large print to 300dpi. You could easily get away with 200-240dpi for a 16x20, or larger. I use smugmug, and have never had an issue with large prints, although, I upload the exact print size, and resolution for the print I want. Do you have a pro account, or are you just using the standard?

The other issue, you should always uprez using Resample Image "Bicubic" this will give you the most accurate pixel recreation, as it samples neighboring pixels. If Bicubic is giving you blurry enlargements, it's most likely that your photo is somewhat soft in the capture phase.

Just my two cents worth.

Mike

---------------------------
You can not depend on your eyes, when your imagination is out of focus.
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Member
 
imported_Marc Kurth's Avatar
 
Posts: 192
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Morro Bay, CA,
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-10-2007, 05:16 PM


I'm sure that people will disagree with me based on their own experience, but I am unwavering in what I have learned after prepping my files for large and very large printing for highway billboards:

1) The RIP’s used by today’s commercial printers will do a far better job of feeding their printer what it needs, than rescaling with any normal Mac/Pc based software. Always leave the file in its native resolution when having prints done on a commercial printer and the let the multi-thousand dollar system do its job of rescaling.

2) Rescale as required for inkjet printing, but I have found products that perform much better than PS Bicubic. Try the old reliable standard: Genuine Fractals or my own favorite - S-Spline used in Photozoom from Benvista Software.

If you want to try out your ability to produce clean files for large prints at a very, very low price.

http://www.elcocolor.com/poster_special.htm

At these prices, go ahead and try one file rescaled with PS and leave the other at it’s native size. You will quickly see what I mean.

Marc
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Forum Regular
 
Silverstangs's Avatar
 
Posts: 910
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sacramento,
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to Silverstangs
12-10-2007, 05:38 PM


Thanks for the tip... looks like I have a new source for big images.

---------------------------
Flicker - Silverstangs
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Member
 
imported_Marc Kurth's Avatar
 
Posts: 192
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Morro Bay, CA,
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-10-2007, 06:15 PM


The other part of my post is actually more valuable :-)

Getting a handle on these systems work will help avoid misunderstandings, like assuming they were going to print at 72 DPI. Keep in mind that some of the best commercial printers print at 240-250 DPI, so they will actually downsize a file that someone arbitrarily upres’d to 300.
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Forum Sponsor
 
SmugMug's Avatar
 
Posts: 592
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Los Altos, CA, California
Real First Name: Markham
Camera: Canon 7D
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-13-2007, 06:56 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverstangs View Post
I've been using Adorama for my prints, mainly the large one. I finally decided to use Smug Mug, which is not too difficult. I was working on the pricing, and noticed that they will only allow certain sizes to be printed, mainly the smaller stuff.

With Adorama, I have the DPI set to 300, which allows me to still print up to 16x24 inch. On SmugMug, it's limiting me to 5x7 as the largest image. For those of you using SmugMug, are you using the default 72 DPI and uploading the images like that?
I am not sure of what you mean that SmugMug "will only allow certain sizes to be printed, mainly the smaller stuff" ?

If you upload low res images, we only allow you (actually show up in the cart) to sell or buy images that will look good at that resolution.

I am not sure where you got the 72 DPI number, as we definitely request more. We print absolutely stunning photos up to 30X40 size. Here is our print catalog: http://www.smugmug.com/prints/catalog.mg

This is a really good help page: http://www.smugmug.com/help/print-quality

We would love to hear your direct comparison with Adorama vs SmugMug. In fact, I would give you a free year of SmugMug if you made a nice side by side gallery of the exact same prints uploaded and purchased.

Thanks,
Markham
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
300dpi, 72dpi, adorama, smugmug

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.