| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||
Photomatix Pro or CS3
This is a discussion on Photomatix Pro or CS3 within the Post Processing Central forums, part of the Photography Information category; What are most users experiences with these 2 programs for HDR? Ease of use, workflow, results....etc. Strictly related to HDR ...
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
(#1)
  |
| Member  | Photomatix Pro or CS3 -
05-16-2007, 11:30 PM
What are most users experiences with these 2 programs for HDR? Ease of use, workflow, results....etc. Strictly related to HDR since I know CS3 has a whole other world of possibilities. |
| |  |
LIKES Received: 
| Sponsored Links |
| Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community. |
|
(#2)
|
| Forum Master  |
05-16-2007, 11:45 PM
CS3 has better HDR than CS2 but I think that Photomatix is still better at HDR than CS3. I am basing this on the beta version of CS3. I have my copy of CS3 but still have not gotten around to installing it. Perhaps this weekend? I do know the merge/alignment of mulitple photos in CS3 is greatly improved and with more features which are also used in the HDR process. HTH |
| | |
|
(#3)
|
| Member  |
05-18-2007, 01:28 PM
I use a combination of the two. I do the initial Merge to HDR in PS and generate a .HDR file from the merge. I then open the .HDR file into the Photomatix standalone application for Tone Mapping and output to a 16 bit TIFF and then do my final processing in PS. CS3 Merge to HDR does seem to do a slightly better job of the merge than CS2. |
| | |
|
| Tags |
| cs3, photomatix, pro |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
| Visit Our Sponsors |
| ||||||
| Google Sponsors |
|
Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
