Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Photography Information > Post Processing Central


I need help with film processing

This is a discussion on I need help with film processing within the Post Processing Central forums, part of the Photography Information category; Any one with experience would be greatly appreciated. I thought that I had ilford 400 loaded, and it turns out ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Uber Poster
 
Dobick's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,712
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Slaton, Texas
Real First Name: Kent
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 33
Likes Given LIKES Given: 11
I need help with film processing - 12-03-2007, 12:20 AM


Any one with experience would be greatly appreciated.

I thought that I had ilford 400 loaded, and it turns out that it was TMax 100, so I need to push 2 stops in developing.

I have only done 4 rolls, and did them completely by the book, so I am out of my element here.

If the recommended time is 6 minutes for standard processing at 68 degrees, how long do I let it sit in the soup for a 2 stop push.

I have found conflicting advice online.

One place said 1 minute extra for each stop. Another said a multiple of 1.33 (if I read correctly) Another said x2.25? I found yet another at 11.5 minutes total.

The chemistry is hc-110 (dil b)

The pictures are nothing special, and I was basically just playing around, but now I would like to know what the rules are.

Thank you greatly for looking.

I also understand that this combo is not the greatest for what I am wanting to do, but at this point I am going to go with what I have.

---------------------------
Nevermind -- I'll take care of it myself!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Forum Regular
 
Big Dog's Avatar
 
Posts: 531
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greater Cedar Hill, Texas
Real First Name: David
Camera: Sony a850, Mamiya RB67
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 1
12-03-2007, 01:26 PM


http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html

---------------------------
David
Built a new darkroom for the betterment of mankind.

http://newdr.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Uber Poster
 
Dobick's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,712
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Slaton, Texas
Real First Name: Kent
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 33
Likes Given LIKES Given: 11
12-03-2007, 01:32 PM


Thank you so much for this!

I ended up doing the 11.5 last night (probably ended up being closer to 12 by the time I got the chemicals off of it, but I think it turned out ok

What do you think?

---------------------------
Nevermind -- I'll take care of it myself!
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Forum Master
 
adirty1's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,292
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: austin(Hutto), Texas
Real First Name: adam
Camera: canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-03-2007, 02:14 PM


you might have wanted to go just a little less time to help with shadow details... Again it really depends on what you shot how much contrast there was in the subject matter all that goes to how much time you would need. I wish I would have seen your message the other night I could have looked that up in my notes and given you a pretty good idea how long to develop your film. seems that you have usable images so all worked out.
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Account Removed Per User Request
 
CobyPhoto's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,087
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: xxxx,
Real First Name: xxxx
Camera: xxxx
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 7

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-03-2007, 10:54 PM


Not too bad for HC-110! I prefer T-MAX developer for pushing my film. I didn't see this or I would have provided you with some times and temps for pushing. At 68 Degrees, with T-Max Developer, it is about 2 minutes per stop you are pushing. Pushing more than a couple of stops, you really need to be careful of the temp, too as it tends to warm and then you can easily over develop. Plus T-Max Developer is easy to mix and a liquid just like HC-110 so you only have to mix wqhat you need.

Are you printing your B & W "old fashioned" or just scanning and digitally printing? Kodak has stopped producing Dektol now, so your options are becoming less and less. (Paper is the hard item to find now.) I am having a hard time finding some of my fav papers for Optical B & W printing.

I have just restorted to scanning and digitally printing them on fine art papers. Takes some tweaking, but I have been getting some great resultsw.

CJ
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Uber Poster
 
Dobick's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,712
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Slaton, Texas
Real First Name: Kent
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 33
Likes Given LIKES Given: 11
12-03-2007, 11:15 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by CobyPhoto
Not too bad for HC-110! I prefer T-MAX developer for pushing my film. I didn't see this or I would have provided you with some times and temps for pushing. At 68 Degrees, with T-Max Developer, it is about 2 minutes per stop you are pushing. Pushing more than a couple of stops, you really need to be careful of the temp, too as it tends to warm and then you can easily over develop. Plus T-Max Developer is easy to mix and a liquid just like HC-110 so you only have to mix wqhat you need.

Are you printing your B & W "old fashioned" or just scanning and digitally printing? Kodak has stopped producing Dektol now, so your options are becoming less and less. (Paper is the hard item to find now.) I am having a hard time finding some of my fav papers for Optical B & W printing.

I have just restorted to scanning and digitally printing them on fine art papers. Takes some tweaking, but I have been getting some great resultsw.

CJ
So far I am just scanning -- as I alluded to in my original post -- I am a total newb when it comes to film in general, and even more so with developing my own. Once I get to a point to where I am more consistently controlling the development process, as well as finding the combinations I like (film and developers) I plan to at some point get into printing my own as well, but that will be a while away. Right now I am just tinkering with a pretty cool hobby.

---------------------------
Nevermind -- I'll take care of it myself!
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Forum Regular
 
Bruce M. Morris's Avatar
 
Posts: 846
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West Fort Worth, Texas
Real First Name: Bruce
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 5
Likes Given LIKES Given: 11
12-04-2007, 09:06 AM


Kent,
I got here a little late, but with TMax film, using TMax developer is great. First the preferred temp is 75F so it is closer to a room temp than 68. plus 2 stops in TMax is not a major problem at all.. I did 400 at 1600 regularly in the Navy, just for the effect and natural light issues onboard ship.

---------------------------
Bruce M. Morris
Cowtown Photography
Fort Worth, TX
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Forum Master
 
adirty1's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,292
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: austin(Hutto), Texas
Real First Name: adam
Camera: canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-04-2007, 10:32 AM


that's true that it's closer and easier at 75f but, your shadows get better development at a cooler degrees. I am more a Rodinal fan... again it all depends on what the subject is and lighting conditions.
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Uber Poster
 
Dobick's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,712
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Slaton, Texas
Real First Name: Kent
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 33
Likes Given LIKES Given: 11
12-04-2007, 10:41 AM


Thanks for the input guys -- The local shop has tmax developer available, so I will probably use that from here on out.

Follow up question:

What is your preferred chemistry and film combination and why?

---------------------------
Nevermind -- I'll take care of it myself!
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
Account Removed Per User Request
 
CobyPhoto's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,087
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: xxxx,
Real First Name: xxxx
Camera: xxxx
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 7

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-04-2007, 11:02 AM


Quote:
Originally Posted by adirty1
that's true that it's closer and easier at 75f but, your shadows get better development at a cooler degrees. I am more a Rodinal fan... again it all depends on what the subject is and lighting conditions.
Dirty,

You are absolutely correct and that is my reasoning for the cooler (alibeit more difficult) processing temp. I occasionally use the warmer temps when I am in a hurry, (and the work isn't as critical) but when it has to be right, I always go for the cooler temps and use a water bath to keep the temp where I want it.

Rodinal is a great developer as well. I wonder how long it is going to be available thou. I have sorta switched to the T-Max Developer (and I like it) since it is more readily available as processing supplies and chemicals are fazed out.

Dobick,

I have a rather large supply of D-19 Developer if you would like to try it. Just pay for shipping to your door! (Dirty, you can have some too! ) D-19 is for High contrast, ariel type photography. It has its uses, thou is fast becoming obsolete.

I prefer the T-Max, Rodinal or Ilford.

CJ
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
Forum Master
 
adirty1's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,292
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: austin(Hutto), Texas
Real First Name: adam
Camera: canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-04-2007, 12:18 PM


they just started making rodinal again a couple years ago.
I am also a huge fan of d76 replenished. I really need to stock up on d76.


I never worried about controlling the temp that much with b/w. I chilled my steel before I started which would hold the temp with in a few degrees of 68f.

Now color on the other hand. I always used a water bath for all the chemistry.
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
Forum Regular
 
Big Dog's Avatar
 
Posts: 531
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greater Cedar Hill, Texas
Real First Name: David
Camera: Sony a850, Mamiya RB67
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 1
12-04-2007, 12:28 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by CobyPhoto
Are you printing your B & W "old fashioned" or just scanning and digitally printing? Kodak has stopped producing Dektol now, so your options are becoming less and less. (Paper is the hard item to find now.) I am having a hard time finding some of my fav papers for Optical B & W printing.
Dektol is still around. Kodak stopped producing B&W paper, but did not (repeat: did NOT) ever stop making B&W chemistry. They also still make color materials (including paper) and all kinds of film.

It is harder to buy analog materials at local stores, but it is readily available mail-order and/or on-line. Things are not that bleak. There are other papers besides the ones Kodak made. If one wants to scan negatives and print them digitally, that's a valid choice, but it should not be made because analog materials aren't available, they are.

---------------------------
David
Built a new darkroom for the betterment of mankind.

http://newdr.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
Account Removed Per User Request
 
CobyPhoto's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,087
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: xxxx,
Real First Name: xxxx
Camera: xxxx
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 7

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-04-2007, 12:39 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dog
Dektol is still around. Kodak stopped producing B&W paper, but did not (repeat: did NOT) ever stop making B&W chemistry. They also still make color materials (including paper) and all kinds of film.

It is harder to buy analog materials at local stores, but it is readily available mail-order and/or on-line. Things are not that bleak. There are other papers besides the ones Kodak made. If one wants to scan negatives and print them digitally, that's a valid choice, but it should not be made because analog materials aren't available, they are.
Thanks David!

I just called my contact at Kodak and you are absolutely correct! Next time I talk to my supplier in town I am gonna beat some knee caps cause I bought extra Dektol this last time!

Maybe he was just looking to boost his sales! LMAO

I don't know where he got his info, but Kodak in Rochester says Dektol is still on the production list and will be available!

I stand corrected.

CJ
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
Forum Master
 
adirty1's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,292
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: austin(Hutto), Texas
Real First Name: adam
Camera: canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
12-04-2007, 01:06 PM


there are some old papers that kodak made that I would love to see another company pick up. The one paper I would love to have back was a paper we used for heavy oils. It was great. No other paper would tone like this. I just cant remember the name. I want to say the name had ART in it. Dah freaking allergies and meds make be dumb.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
film, processing

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.