Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorpeland Yes very good job. As it was said above, if I had not seen the original I wouldn't have known it was re-touched. And I think that says a lot. Granted its a small pic and we can't study the detail up close. But overall it looks extremely good! |
Thank you, you can see the larger version here:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2244/...f7d121a4_o.jpg Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorpeland One question to ask to those in this thread is, has there ever been a time you've done face re-touching such as this and you were almost afraid to show the subject because you feel they might be offended? My situation was I did a shoot for a guy who had a very "weathered" face. Well during post processing after the shoot I did the skin re-touching and the guy looked 15 years younger! I had actually really impressed myself with how well i pulled it off. But later decided to give him the more original looking, slightly touched up final versions. He was quite happy with them. But I was so afraid he would have been offended with the clean up id done. Thoughts? |
Since this one was a close relative, I didn't have a problem showing her. I knew exactly how she would take it.
But I have struggled with that same "moral" question before. However it had to do with taking some inches off a client. I did what you did and ended up playing it safe by not being so drastic (actually she never even noticed) and it turned out great.
I believe in more subtle changes for everyday people. Maybe a bump in whiteness of the teeth, soften the skin just a little, slightly thin some common trouble areas (not enough to notice though), remove the zits, leave the moles, sharpen the eyes if needed.... Nothing like what I did in the original post.
Models are a different story though, glam it up!
YMMV