Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Photography Information > Post Processing Central


Why does "Save for Web" desaturate my photos? How do I compensate?

This is a discussion on Why does "Save for Web" desaturate my photos? How do I compensate? within the Post Processing Central forums, part of the Photography Information category; I'm in the process of uploading my photos to a CMD website, but when I go to "Save for Web", ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Uber Poster
 
S-Man's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,789
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Sam
Camera: Canon 5D, 40D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 11

Likes Received LIKES Received: 7
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Why does "Save for Web" desaturate my photos? How do I compensate? - 04-22-2009, 09:21 AM


I'm in the process of uploading my photos to a CMD website, but when I go to "Save for Web", all the photos get desaturated and look blah.
I really have to bump up the saturation to get it to look right.
I also just noticed that using Adobe ImageReady shows what it will look like before I upload it, I just don't know how to use IR.
What can be done to either 1) stop the desturation or 2) compensate so I can batch-process photos?

Thanks.

P.S. After a search turned up nothing, I had to ask. Sorry if this has been covered before.

---------------------------
Sam
Houston Wedding Photographer
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Uber Poster
 
Rson's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,742
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Keller, Texas
Real First Name: Rich
Camera: A disposable from CVS
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 84
Likes Given LIKES Given: 14
04-22-2009, 09:26 AM


Can you post a unedited one and a SFW one. My guess is that the SFW is dropping the dpi, and maybe altering the color profile.
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Uber Poster
 
S-Man's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,789
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Sam
Camera: Canon 5D, 40D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 11

Likes Received LIKES Received: 7
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
04-22-2009, 09:44 AM


Original (linked from Smugmug):


And the Save for Web version:
Attached Images
 

---------------------------
Sam
Houston Wedding Photographer
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Uber Poster
 
S-Man's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,789
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Sam
Camera: Canon 5D, 40D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 11

Likes Received LIKES Received: 7
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
04-22-2009, 09:45 AM


I'm not sure, but maybe on your monitor the SFW version looks better. It's just an example of what's going on. It kind of desaturates the photo.
I too was thinking that it might change the color profile. But it should be sRGB all the way across...

---------------------------
Sam
Houston Wedding Photographer
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Uber Poster
 
boxofrocks's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,654
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Coppell, Texas
Real First Name: Tom
Camera: Nikon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 11

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via Skype™ to boxofrocks
04-22-2009, 10:05 AM


One other thing to note--SM applies some sharpening in galleries. Can't remember what the default level is, but you can control it in the customize gallery settings.

---------------------------
thomasmanchester.com

To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.
-Sir Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Senior Member
 
joedanger11's Avatar
 
Posts: 356
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Real First Name: Joseph
Camera: Canon 5D Mark II
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 7

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
04-22-2009, 10:09 AM


is the original color profile in sRGB also? i was working in adobe RGB then did "save for web" and it shifted the colors a bit. I solved this by converting the color profile to "sRGB" before saving.

---------------------------
flickr/joedanger
www.harmoniqphotography.com

14 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8, 85 1.2 II, 70-200 2.8 IS
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
brad's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,314
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DFW, Texas
Real First Name: Brad (duh)
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 12

Likes Received LIKES Received: 136
Likes Given LIKES Given: 33
04-22-2009, 10:54 AM


Easy Answer: Don't use Save For Web .. resize it yourself, reapply sharpening, and save it at a compression rate of 8 or so... it'll be fine for the web at that point.

---------------------------
Brad Barton, Grand Prairie, TX (DFW) Twitter -- Blog -- Headshots -- Portraits
Honest critiques always welcomed.
An artist is not paid for his labor, but for his vision. -- James Whistler, Painter, 1834-1903
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Light Moderator
 
srwatters's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,942
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Plano, Texas
Real First Name: Scott
Camera: Nikon D3 & Hasselblad H2
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 16

Likes Received LIKES Received: 47
Likes Given LIKES Given: 10
04-22-2009, 11:47 AM


+1 Brad.

If you don't want the EXiF data to show, strip it yourself.

---------------------------
Scott Watters
PoloDigital | Flickr | Pbase
Nikon | Hasselblad | Phase One | Hensel | Apple
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
Uber Poster
 
S-Man's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,789
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Sam
Camera: Canon 5D, 40D
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 11

Likes Received LIKES Received: 7
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
04-22-2009, 12:34 PM


I'm saving for a flash site from CMD, and just following instructions from there.
Thanks for the tip, Brad.
Could you expound a bit on what to do?
Ideally, I need to make an action for it, as I have quite a bit of images to resize.

They say to save it in 72dpi, so I resize that first, then resize to the maximum image size allowable, (max = 1600x1000) then save for web.
Why is SFW necessary after you resize it? Does it compress the file even more?

Sorry for my ignorance, but I really haven't taken the time to learn all these technicalities about 'the internets'

---------------------------
Sam
Houston Wedding Photographer
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
Forum Regular
 
msabas's Avatar
 
Posts: 570
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Real First Name: Mariano
Camera: Nikon D200
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 2

Likes Received LIKES Received: 2
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
04-22-2009, 12:59 PM


I havent tried the sRGB then save for web but save for web is only meant to save a small sized file for uploading to web. Which helps out with loading and website performance. But for people like us who's sole purpose is to showcase our wonderful work at its highest level of quality Save for Web does us no good.

but as Brad stated...resize it yourself and save it under a lower compression rate...

Quote:
Originally Posted by brad View Post
Easy Answer: Don't use Save For Web .. resize it yourself, reapply sharpening, and save it at a compression rate of 8 or so... it'll be fine for the web at that point.

---------------------------
Mariano Sabas
SABAS | twitter | flickr | deviantART |
Nikon D200 | Nikon N80 | Mac Book Pro | G4 Powerpc Mac |


"Many are the plans in a man's heart, but it is the Lords purpose that prevails"
Proverbs 19:21
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
Senior Member
 
joedanger11's Avatar
 
Posts: 356
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Real First Name: Joseph
Camera: Canon 5D Mark II
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 7

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
04-22-2009, 01:32 PM


agreed. i only use save for web when i want to optimize the entire webpage. i normally keep my images as uncompressed as possible.

---------------------------
flickr/joedanger
www.harmoniqphotography.com

14 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8, 85 1.2 II, 70-200 2.8 IS
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
Light Moderator
 
srwatters's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,942
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Plano, Texas
Real First Name: Scott
Camera: Nikon D3 & Hasselblad H2
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 16

Likes Received LIKES Received: 47
Likes Given LIKES Given: 10
04-22-2009, 01:41 PM


Just a side note... You mention 72dpi. That number means nothing when you are displaying images on a computer. The only thing that matters is the number of pixels. Unless you are combining two or more images, then they need to be at the same dpi (or more properly ppi). Add to that the fact that most modern displays are more like 96-110ppi, the old 72ppi makes no sense.

---------------------------
Scott Watters
PoloDigital | Flickr | Pbase
Nikon | Hasselblad | Phase One | Hensel | Apple
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
Member
 
Jfiumara's Avatar
 
Posts: 99
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Georgetown, Texas
Real First Name: Jessica
Camera: Canon 30D
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 4

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
04-22-2009, 01:50 PM


I ran into the same problem regarding the SFW totally washing out the colors. I am wanting to make an action that I can run on a batch that will resize, sharpen, add my watermark, etc so they're ready for blogging.

I know how to do all of the steps except resizing. If I were doing each photo individually, I would manually resize the long edge to 800 pixels. Is there a way to write it into an action so that it recognizes which is the long edge and resizes accordingly?
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
Light Moderator
 
srwatters's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,942
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Plano, Texas
Real First Name: Scott
Camera: Nikon D3 & Hasselblad H2
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 16

Likes Received LIKES Received: 47
Likes Given LIKES Given: 10
04-22-2009, 01:56 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jfiumara View Post
Is there a way to write it into an action so that it recognizes which is the long edge and resizes accordingly?
In Photoshop (at least CS3 or CS4) you can use the image processor or fit image. In CS4 it's under File->Scripts->Image Processor and File->Automate->Fit Image.

Either one works. I believe the image processor uses the underlying Fit Image engine. Remember to set your image resize method in the 'General' preference (options) page. I use Bi-cubic sharper for the default since most times I'm downsizing.

Good luck!

---------------------------
Scott Watters
PoloDigital | Flickr | Pbase
Nikon | Hasselblad | Phase One | Hensel | Apple
Reply With Quote
  (#15) Old
rebmeM muimerP
 
Jake's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,225
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Watauga(DFW), Texas
Real First Name: Jake
Camera: Canon 5D2
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 14

Likes Received LIKES Received: 352
Likes Given LIKES Given: 275
04-22-2009, 02:35 PM


The "Fit Image" command is in CS2 as well.

The resize action I use goes like this:
Downsize to 1800px using Bi-cubic sharper.
Then it resizes to 600px using "Fit Image" and just Bicubic.
Then I apply a small amount of USM (50-0.4-1) and save.


I do not like "Save for Web."

---------------------------
Check out the NEW Pixtus Photography Cheat Sheet!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
compensate, desaturate, photos, save for web

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.