Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Photography Information > Video Vault


Micro-stock machine

This is a discussion on Micro-stock machine within the Video Vault forums, part of the Photography Information category; This guy has carved out his own little corner of the micro-stock industry. He supposedly sells 2000 images per day, ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
JohnT's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,958
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas
Real First Name: John
Camera: 5DMkII, 7D, LX3
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 24

Likes Received LIKES Received: 116
Likes Given LIKES Given: 438
Micro-stock machine - 06-29-2009, 07:30 PM


This guy has carved out his own little corner of the micro-stock industry. He supposedly sells 2000 images per day, every day of the year.

http://strobist.blogspot.com/2009/06...icrostock.html

---------------------------
Everyone wants to be a rock star, but no one wants to learn the chords.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Forum Regular
 
BEphoto's Avatar
 
Posts: 664
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Onalaska, Wisconsin
Real First Name: Brad
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 6

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
06-30-2009, 12:32 AM


That is very cool. I cant believe how much stuff he has specifically for stock photography.

---------------------------
Canon Gear
Website
My Blog
Flickr
Twitter
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Premium Member
 
merock's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,327
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Real First Name: Merrick
Camera: Nikon D700
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 7
Likes Given LIKES Given: 4
Send a message via AIM to merock Send a message via MSN to merock
06-30-2009, 11:48 AM


Cool, but stock is el diablo IMHO.... especially micro stock. ugh.

---------------------------
Tug on anything at all and you'll find it connected to everything else in the universe. - John Muir
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Forum Master
 
adirty1's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,292
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: austin(Hutto), Texas
Real First Name: adam
Camera: canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 1
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
06-30-2009, 01:21 PM


It almost looks like part of that studio is outside. He is shooting in huge light tent. I like that idea. He's got it down to a science I will say that.
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Senior Member
 
arcproducts's Avatar
 
Posts: 403
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Real First Name: Susan
Camera: NIKON D200
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 13

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
06-30-2009, 01:36 PM


I Want !!!!!!!

---------------------------
www.susanlong.net
www.susanlongnet.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Account Banned
 
Imagebuffet's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,984
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Plano,
Real First Name: Richard
Camera: Canon 20D
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
07-04-2009, 02:38 PM


He has a fairly nice setup for making only $280 / day (that's $0.14 / photo * 2000 photos per day = $280.00, the going rate for microstock photo sales that I've seen). Based on this, I am guessing that he grosses about $80k-$100k/year.

My Mom wants me to sign up to microstock sites, so that I could make at least a few dollars on my photos. I simply refuse. If I can't get a decent sale from my photos, I'm not selling.

Last edited by Imagebuffet; 07-04-2009 at 02:49 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
JohnT's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,958
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas
Real First Name: John
Camera: 5DMkII, 7D, LX3
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 24

Likes Received LIKES Received: 116
Likes Given LIKES Given: 438
07-04-2009, 04:07 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Imagebuffet View Post
He has a fairly nice setup for making only $280 / day (that's $0.14 / photo * 2000 photos per day = $280.00, the going rate for microstock photo sales that I've seen). Based on this, I am guessing that he grosses about $80k-$100k/year.

My Mom wants me to sign up to microstock sites, so that I could make at least a few dollars on my photos. I simply refuse. If I can't get a decent sale from my photos, I'm not selling.
Well, it's certainly a personal thing. However, the way I look at it is this guy is making around $80-100k/yr. selling his photos, and I'm not. I think sometimes photographers have a tendency to hold onto their "art" too tightly and esteem it too highly—myself included.

---------------------------
Everyone wants to be a rock star, but no one wants to learn the chords.
Reply With Quote
  (#8) Old
Account Banned
 
Imagebuffet's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,984
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Plano,
Real First Name: Richard
Camera: Canon 20D
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
07-04-2009, 04:58 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnT View Post
Well, it's certainly a personal thing. However, the way I look at it is this guy is making around $80-100k/yr. selling his photos, and I'm not. I think sometimes photographers have a tendency to hold onto their "art" too tightly and esteem it too highly—myself included.
Just keep in mind that you cannot expect more than an average of $0.14 per sale from your photos, then figure out how many sales per day/month/year you would have to make to make the effort financially realistic for you. Are you prepared to conduct at least 600 sales transactions per day, every day? That's what you would have to do to gross $32k/year.

In my entire life, I have had 4 sales of my photographs. I could have made $0.56, if I had gone the microstock route. Instead, I made about $200.

It just galls me that a million-dollar company with thousands of dollars for ad revenue will buy a half-dozen photos from me for a few dollars, enabling them to sell thousands of dollars-worth of merchandise, products or services. No, I don't feel any better if the company is some small mom-and-pop with an ad budget of $150.

I think that photographers are getting short-changed by this process.

Last edited by Imagebuffet; 07-04-2009 at 05:01 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#9) Old
You Can't Be Serious!!
 
JohnT's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,958
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas
Real First Name: John
Camera: 5DMkII, 7D, LX3
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 24

Likes Received LIKES Received: 116
Likes Given LIKES Given: 438
07-04-2009, 05:24 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Imagebuffet View Post
Just keep in mind that you cannot expect more than an average of $0.14 per sale from your photos, then figure out how many sales per day/month/year you would have to make to make the effort financially realistic for you. Are you prepared to conduct at least 600 sales transactions per day, every day? That's what you would have to do to gross $32k/year.

In my entire life, I have had 4 sales of my photographs. I could have made $0.56, if I had gone the microstock route. Instead, I made about $200.

It just galls me that a million-dollar company with thousands of dollars for ad revenue will buy a half-dozen photos from me for a few dollars, enabling them to sell thousands of dollars-worth of merchandise, products or services. No, I don't feel any better if the company is some small mom-and-pop with an ad budget of $150.

I think that photographers are getting short-changed by this process.
Yeah, I can see your point and agree with you, but unfortunately I don't think it's going to change any time soon. That's probably why this guy developed this system. However, microstock does have the effect of devaluing the work of professional stock photographers.

---------------------------
Everyone wants to be a rock star, but no one wants to learn the chords.
Reply With Quote
  (#10) Old
Forum Master
 
Crashoran's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,404
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cedar Park, Texas, Texas
Real First Name: Nick
Camera: Canon 40d
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to Crashoran
07-04-2009, 05:47 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Imagebuffet View Post
He has a fairly nice setup for making only $280 / day (that's $0.14 / photo * 2000 photos per day = $280.00, the going rate for microstock photo sales that I've seen). Based on this, I am guessing that he grosses about $80k-$100k/year.

My Mom wants me to sign up to microstock sites, so that I could make at least a few dollars on my photos. I simply refuse. If I can't get a decent sale from my photos, I'm not selling.
Yuri grosses over $1.2 million/year. EDIT: $1.3M

His studio, which was originally a greenhouse, was modified to basically be a huge light tent. He is an amazing photographer and it shows in his work. I'm astonished at his success, he has found his niche and I applaud him for that!

He would without a doubt do fine as a traditional stock photographer, but he is and always has been dominating the microstock industry, so no reason change to traditional.

---------------------------
www.moorevisuals.com

Last edited by Crashoran; 07-04-2009 at 06:00 PM..
Reply With Quote
  (#11) Old
Account Banned
 
Imagebuffet's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,984
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Plano,
Real First Name: Richard
Camera: Canon 20D
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
07-04-2009, 06:22 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Crashoran View Post
Yuri grosses over $1.2 million/year. EDIT: $1.3M
Oh, wow, that's about $0.60 a sale! It would take only 166 sales each day to produce $100 / day ($36.5k/year) income at that rate.

Everyone would have to decide what the job is worth for them, but when people ask me why I don't become a photographer as a profession, I tell them it is because there is no money in it. I've spent enough of my life investing large sums of time, money and effort for very little reward.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crashoran View Post
His studio, which was originally a greenhouse, was modified to basically be a huge light tent. He is an amazing photographer and it shows in his work. I'm astonished at his success, he has found his niche and I applaud him for that!

He would without a doubt do fine as a traditional stock photographer, but he is and always has been dominating the microstock industry, so no reason change to traditional.
That sounds a lot like congratulating the spam king, a connection that is not entirely coincidental, as this microstock finds its way onto spam ads. The low cost of microstock naturally feeds into spam sending out millions of fliers all over the world.
Reply With Quote
  (#12) Old
Forum Master
 
Crashoran's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,404
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cedar Park, Texas, Texas
Real First Name: Nick
Camera: Canon 40d
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to Crashoran
07-04-2009, 06:41 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Imagebuffet View Post
Oh, wow, that's about $0.60 a sale! It would take only 166 sales each day to produce $100 / day ($36.5k/year) income at that rate.

Everyone would have to decide what the job is worth for them, but when people ask me why I don't become a photographer as a profession, I tell them it is because there is no money in it. I've spent enough of my life investing large sums of time, money and effort for very little reward.



That sounds a lot like congratulating the spam king, a connection that is not entirely coincidental, as this microstock finds its way onto spam ads. The low cost of microstock naturally feeds into spam sending out millions of fliers all over the world.
There is money in photography, it requires hard work.

This microstock debate has been beaten to death over and over. The accusation that all spam ads come from micro agencies is false and uneducated...

I'm sure if you worked hard to earn over $100,000+USD each month, you wouldn't quit what you're doing just because others feel you are devaluing yourself. If you feel your work is worth way more than what microstock has to offer, then go right ahead - the door is open for you. Nobody is holding you back. No reason to hate on somebody because of their success.

Like I said previously, this topic has been beaten to death already.

---------------------------
www.moorevisuals.com
Reply With Quote
  (#13) Old
Account Banned
 
Imagebuffet's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,984
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Plano,
Real First Name: Richard
Camera: Canon 20D
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
07-04-2009, 08:01 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by Crashoran View Post
There is money in photography, it requires hard work.

This microstock debate has been beaten to death over and over. The accusation that all spam ads come from micro agencies is false and uneducated...
No one claimed that all spam ads come from micro agencies. But, where do you suppose most spam ads *that have stock photos in them* get their stock photos? Of course, many spam ads don't have any photos in them, but many do, too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crashoran View Post
I'm sure if you worked hard to earn over $100,000+USD each month, you wouldn't quit what you're doing just because others feel you are devaluing yourself.
Or devaluing others and the profession.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crashoran View Post
If you feel your work is worth way more than what microstock has to offer, then go right ahead - the door is open for you. Nobody is holding you back. No reason to hate on somebody because of their success.
I'm not hating on somebody because of his success. I am hating on microstock and the way it devalues photography.
Reply With Quote
  (#14) Old
Forum Master
 
Crashoran's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,404
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cedar Park, Texas, Texas
Real First Name: Nick
Camera: Canon 40d
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 1

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
Send a message via AIM to Crashoran
07-04-2009, 08:18 PM


That's your opinion and I respect it.

---------------------------
www.moorevisuals.com
Reply With Quote
  (#15) Old
Camouflaged Moderator
 
Daniel Bates's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,352
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Daegu, Korea
Real First Name: Daniel
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 9

Likes Received LIKES Received: 31
Likes Given LIKES Given: 35
07-04-2009, 08:35 PM


At least microstock doesn't give their images away for free and possible photo credits.

---------------------------
Forum Rules Here | How To: Report rule violations
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
machine, microstock

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.