Last Outdoor Wedding 2009: CC welcomed

[syuan]

These were shot at the Rose Garden in Tyler Tx.

Btw, I can probably use some pointer on the logo stamping. It took me a while to make it and each image is done manually. Need to find a more automated way....

[Angelo]

Lovely couple.

[kayumangi]

Nice images sam.

I like the sweet spot you did on the 2nd to the last image. Did you use a Tilt shift or a lens baby?

My only gripe is the last image, I don't know, the pose is not working for me, maybe I'm just used to having the groom standing up behind the bride or something.

[syuan]

Originally Posted by kayumangi

Nice images sam.

I like the sweet spot you did on the 2nd to the last image. Did you use a Tilt shift or a lens baby?

My only gripe is the last image, I don't know, the pose is not working for me, maybe I'm just used to having the groom standing up behind the bride or something.

Thanks for the feedback, Marius! The zooming motion in the 2nd to the last image was actually added post. And the last image was a "hey,let's take a picture at this bench before you guys take off" shot. Could probably get a better pose had I not been in a hurry.

[semperaggie]

the last and second to last look a little oversharpened to me?

[syuan]

Originally Posted by semperaggie

the last and second to last look a little oversharpened to me?

thanks for the feedback, Heather. The resized image for web posting always looks different from the original. I Either have them looking soft or sometimes with jpg artifact showing up, which might cause the image to have an oversharpen appearance?...

[ThiNguyen]

Sam,

This is the same post that I put on the Wedding section.

From what I am seeing, your picture are not there yet. Don't worry about the logo, focus on the images.

There are many things you can improve on the images, lighting, focus, framing, etc. One thing that I would change is not shooting the B&G in the bright sun. The shadow on the groom face in the kissing shot is not good.

I am sure other people want to make comments. I saw your post but no comments for a while so I jump in. I hope I am not too hard on you. But I don't normally sugarcoat my thoughts & comments.

[syuan]

Originally Posted by ThiNguyen

Sam,

This is the same post that I put on the Wedding section.

From what I am seeing, your picture are not there yet. Don't worry about the logo, focus on the images.

There are many things you can improve on the images, lighting, focus, framing, etc. One thing that I would change is not shooting the B&G in the bright sun. The shadow on the groom face in the kissing shot is not good.

I am sure other people want to make comments. I saw your post but no comments for a while so I jump in. I hope I am not too hard on you. But I don't normally sugarcoat my thoughts & comments.

Thi
thank you for your honest feedback. Would love a bit more the specifics on cc other than 'improve on images, lighting, focus, framing' For the kissing screne, I should have brought my wireless flash for fill. again, appreciate your comment.

[ThiNguyen]

I thought the lighting you chose was hash on the couple, blocking out the groom face. The sharpness on the images are not quite there. Of course I can only say this based on the 6 images that you showed on my computer. They may be a lot sharper on your PC.

Thi

[ldelacruz]

Sam,
I think I have seen your ad in a wedding magazine?

[syuan]

I tried "weddingsinhouston" for a while. It didn't work that well for me...

Originally Posted by ldelacruz

Sam,
I think I have seen your ad in a wedding magazine?

[ldelacruz]

Yeah, that was it.