Follow us on Twitter!
Follow us on Facebook!
 

Go Back   Pixtus - Photography Forum, Photographers, Photo Tips > Showcase > Weddings


Theresa Bridal (please critique)

This is a discussion on Theresa Bridal (please critique) within the Weddings forums, part of the Showcase category; This is a random shot my first ever bridals from yesterday. Not sure why I PP'd this one first as ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1) Old
Forum Master
 
arich's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,205
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Andrew
Camera: Canon 1D Mark III
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 16

Likes Received LIKES Received: 65
Likes Given LIKES Given: 111
Theresa Bridal (please critique) - 04-10-2011, 03:49 PM

Critique: CC:

This is a random shot my first ever bridals from yesterday. Not sure why I PP'd this one first as it really isn't my favorite. Definitely want to hear people's thoughts though.


---------------------------
Canon 1D Mark III, 16-35mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Tamron 300mm 3.8, (2) 580EX I's, Einsteins and Buff gear
Check out my blog!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.
  (#2) Old
Senior Member
 
bthompson's Avatar
 
Posts: 292
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Plano, Texas
Real First Name: Brandi
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
04-11-2011, 11:02 AM


I think your color looks pretty good and exposure looks pretty good. On the negative side, too deep depth of field contributes to a snapshotty feel and the pose and angle gives her a weird body shape.

---------------------------
http://www.brandithompsonphotography.com
Reply With Quote
  (#3) Old
Tom Tom is online now
Premium Member
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,702
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Tom
Camera: GoPro2
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 7

Likes Received LIKES Received: 425
Likes Given LIKES Given: 296
04-11-2011, 11:09 AM


To add to that, using a wide angle lens is unflattering to the subject. Try something longer than 50mm. 85-200mm is ideal.

---------------------------
Canon | Elinchrom | Apple
Kingwood Wedding Photographer
Aggie Wedding and Portrait Photographer
Reply With Quote
  (#4) Old
Member
 
sn805619's Avatar
 
Posts: 54
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Dallas, Texas
Real First Name: Scott
Camera: Canon 7d
Can Others Edit My Photos: Yes
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 0
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
04-11-2011, 11:09 AM


+1 to depth of field.

What is the shadow of (on the ground behind her)? Diffuser?
Reply With Quote
  (#5) Old
Forum Master
 
arich's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,205
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Andrew
Camera: Canon 1D Mark III
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 16

Likes Received LIKES Received: 65
Likes Given LIKES Given: 111
04-11-2011, 11:43 AM


Thanks everyone.

Brandi: good points, thanks

Thomas: So if you want to do a full-body shot I assume you just back up far enough?

Scott: Yeah, one of the reasons I wasn't really planning on using this shot lol.

I'll post a few more once I finish going through them and would love more critique, definitely want to get better!

---------------------------
Canon 1D Mark III, 16-35mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Tamron 300mm 3.8, (2) 580EX I's, Einsteins and Buff gear
Check out my blog!
Reply With Quote
  (#6) Old
Forum Master
 
MicWayWal's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,822
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Plano, Texas
Real First Name: Michael
Camera: Canon
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 0

Likes Received LIKES Received: 22
Likes Given LIKES Given: 0
04-11-2011, 12:08 PM


Andrew,
I am not sure why you picked this image either. It appears this is the test picture that you take to check your settings before you start taking real images.
The pose is very, very static and rigid. She is standing with her weight equally on both feet, her shoulders are slumped down, her arms are hanging straight down showing flab under her arm pit, she looks like a wide shapely pole. Her eyes are cut too far to the right so no white is seen on the far side of each eye and no catch-lights are visible in the eyes.
Subject placement on background is distracting. Her head is cut by the line of the concrete coming in from the side causing the flower to be lost. The lines of the walkway railing is cutting her body in half. The white tree trunks in the background are too bright and very distracting.
Angle of view is too low especially at 17mm zoom. Wide angle lenses distorts elements in the middle of the view to be ballooned. This will make her tummy look larger, not a good thing with a bridal. It also gives you a great view of the underside of her chin and nose.
Your Main Light is the best part of this image. It is very nice and flattering on her face, body, and dress. Too bad you can't see it in her eyes. However the glow around the bride caused by the darkening of the background is distracting.

In my view there are too many negative elements for this image to be usable image for your portfolio but if the client likes it, I would sell it to her without mentioning any of these comments.

---------------------------
Michael Wayne
(blog) (website)
Reply With Quote
  (#7) Old
Forum Master
 
arich's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,205
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Real First Name: Andrew
Camera: Canon 1D Mark III
Can Others Edit My Photos: No
iTrader Rating: 16

Likes Received LIKES Received: 65
Likes Given LIKES Given: 111
04-11-2011, 01:37 PM


Quote:
Originally Posted by MicWayWal View Post
Andrew,
I am not sure why you picked this image either. It appears this is the test picture that you take to check your settings before you start taking real images.
The pose is very, very static and rigid. She is standing with her weight equally on both feet, her shoulders are slumped down, her arms are hanging straight down showing flab under her arm pit, she looks like a wide shapely pole. Her eyes are cut too far to the right so no white is seen on the far side of each eye and no catch-lights are visible in the eyes.
Subject placement on background is distracting. Her head is cut by the line of the concrete coming in from the side causing the flower to be lost. The lines of the walkway railing is cutting her body in half. The white tree trunks in the background are too bright and very distracting.
Angle of view is too low especially at 17mm zoom. Wide angle lenses distorts elements in the middle of the view to be ballooned. This will make her tummy look larger, not a good thing with a bridal. It also gives you a great view of the underside of her chin and nose.
Your Main Light is the best part of this image. It is very nice and flattering on her face, body, and dress. Too bad you can't see it in her eyes. However the glow around the bride caused by the darkening of the background is distracting.

In my view there are too many negative elements for this image to be usable image for your portfolio but if the client likes it, I would sell it to her without mentioning any of these comments.
Haha I really have no clue why I did

Here's another one, I already know all of my own issues with it but I'm completely open to more critique.

One of my biggest struggles is posing and communicating to the model/bride/whatever how I want them to stand, I've just never had a chance to observe another photog interacting with their subject.


---------------------------
Canon 1D Mark III, 16-35mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Tamron 300mm 3.8, (2) 580EX I's, Einsteins and Buff gear
Check out my blog!

Last edited by arich; 04-11-2011 at 02:30 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bridal, critique, theresa

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Visit Our Sponsors
 

Google Sponsors

Premium Members do not see Google advertisements. SIGN UP today and help support our community.

Copyright ©2004 - 2011, Abel Longoria - www.Pixtus.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.