Quote:
|
Originally Posted by okcwannabe I have a professional photographer at home to tell me things I'm doing wrong and right and he doesn't do it in a way that leaves me feeling torn appart...It doesn't mean you can't be honest or call out things you see, just not so blunt. This is why I would never want to do weddings...too much PRESSURE ;) to get those moments! I admire those of you able to do that. Anyways that's off the subject, again great job Amy! |
Amanda,
I'm sorry you find my critique of Amy's work harsh. It's meant with good intentions. I want her to be better. For her own sake and for my industry.
I am a professional. I own a portrait studio. I shoot weddings because I enjoy them. Not because I "have" to. I can't tell you how many of my clients come in and tell me how horrible their wedding photographer was. It happens all the time. These are people who "think" they've hired a professional. Now a days people put up a website and "bam" they're in business. Just because they may have shot one or two weddings and done a decent job doesn't mean they have consistent enough work to deal with difficult lighting situations. With weddings you never know what you're walking into. For instance Amy walked in to high dark ceilings. She needed a bounce card or a light modifier for her flash. It would have improved her photos ten fold. You also don't have to bounce only off a ceiling. I bounce of walls, off people, into reflectors off anything I can. My point is. These could be better. I'm not trying to hurt her feelings. But all these people telling her they were good when really they're not... isn't going to help her to improve.
It gets pretty irritating to take the time to respond to someone's post with a real thought out critique and with suggestions on how to improve then to have a bunch of people chime in with "no, they're so pretty!!" That doesn't help the photographer get better. I'm sorry. I'm not going to candy coat it. I'm not rude in my critique. I tell whomever I'm critiquing exactly what I think, when they ask for a CC I give it to them. I'm busy. It takes time to write out these responses. If they really don't want to hear what people have to say then they should just say... please look at my photos but don't say anything unless it's going to be nice. Amy however took all the critique well. She will improve. She will get better because she's listening to advice. Is it hard to hear? Sure it is. People are emotionally attached to their work. That is part of being an artist. This is why it's best to become a craftsman too. Not just an artist. Some Photographers who really preach the "I'm an artist" like to try to pass off "bad exposures and poor composition" as "art" when really... it's bad photography. So they play with it in Photoshop so then they have "enhanced crap" but still crap none the less.
I believe that all critique is valuable. To someone who doesn't know very much about photography, lighting, etc. etc. They might see these photos and think they're "good". When you're on a forum such as this where there are so many extremes....you have the "just starting out crowd" and "seasoned professionals" and those who think "they're seasoned professionals" there is going to be a wide range of opinion. Photography is subjective but there are rules. So all advice should be taken with a grain of salt. Just because someone is in business doesn't mean they're any good. I know a lot of mediocre photographers who are great sales people. My point is that if a person takes the time to give a critique it's rude not to accept it with a "thank you." regardless if you agree with them or not. When people defend their mediocre work it makes me cringe because to me that says they don't care, they're not going to listen and take it in and their work will suffer. Let me also say... that JUST BECAUSE A CLIENT MAY LIKE IT OR EVEN BUY IT it doesn't make it good photography. I also hate that come back when you give a critque and they'll say... well the client love it. Well that's because they don't know any better and often they love the subject matter so much that all they see is that person that they love. Why do you think there are so many baby and children photographers out there? You can totally suck and still make a decent living! Weddings though... yeah not so easy.
People who are shooting wedding's in particular who are still learning "on the job" yet taking money for photographing are living dangerously. Weddings ARE a once in a lifetime event. You have to be good. You have to be consisitant and it's certainly NOT the time to be learning on the job as the "main" shooter. I believe that anyone who wants to learn needs to pay their dues. You have to be an assistant and while you can get paid as a second shooter you shouldn't be accepting money and opening business when you don't know what you're doing. It gives photographers a bad name, it hurts our industry because they're often priced poorly and have substandard work.
So, please don't judge me or the others for giving her professional advice. She asked for the help.